首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >International Jurisdiction in Online EU Trade Mark Infringement Cases: Where is the Place of Infringement Located?
【24h】

International Jurisdiction in Online EU Trade Mark Infringement Cases: Where is the Place of Infringement Located?

机译:欧盟在线商标侵权案件中的国际管辖区:侵权地点在哪里?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Article 97 of the European Union Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR) sets out a number of grounds to determine international jurisdiction in cases of alleged infringement of an EU trade mark (EUTM). Besides the possibility of bringing proceedings before the courts of the Member State of domicile/establishment of the defendant/claimant and where the EU Intellectual Property Office (formerly the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market) has its seat, art.97(5) EUTMR also allows for proceedings to be brought "in the courts of the Member State in which the act of infringement has been committed or threatened". In the absence of specific guidance from the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU), this contribution asks how art.97(5) EUTMR is to be interpreted in relation to proceedings for the alleged infringement of a EUTM over the internet. It concludes that, in light of preceding jurisprudence, the CJEU may hold that this is place where the activation of the process for the technical display of infringing content on a certain website takes place. While in the majority of instances this is likely to be the same place where the defendant is domiciled/established, this may not always be the case.
机译:欧盟商标法规(EUTMR)第97条规定了确定涉嫌侵犯欧盟商标(EUTM)案件的国际管辖权的多种依据。第97条第(5)款不仅可以将诉讼提起至成员国/被告人/申诉人所在地的成员国法院,还可以在欧盟知识产权局(以前称为内部市场协调局)所在地。 EUTMR还允许“在发生或威胁实施侵权行为的成员国法院提起诉讼”。在欧盟法院(CJEU)没有具体指导的情况下,该文稿询问如何对涉嫌通过互联网侵犯EUTM的诉讼程序解释EUTMR第97(5)条。结论是,根据先前的判例,欧洲法院可能认为该地点是在某个网站上激活侵权内容技术显示过程的地方。虽然在大多数情况下,这很可能是被告住所/成立地相同的地方,但情况并非总是如此。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号