首页> 外文期刊>European intellectual property review >Right and Wrong Analogies: The CJEU's use of Trade Mark Concepts in Copyright and Design Law
【24h】

Right and Wrong Analogies: The CJEU's use of Trade Mark Concepts in Copyright and Design Law

机译:对与错的类比:欧盟法院在版权和设计法中使用商标概念

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In the last few years, the Court of Justice of the European Union has started to use notions of one intellectual property right (IPR), namely trade mark law, to decide cases dealing with other IPRs, namely designs and copyright. This article analyses this case law. It shows that in some cases, this practice is justified but in others, is controversial, even misplaced, and concludes that the Advocates General and the Court should be wary of extending notions or reasonings from one IPR to another without having carefully verified whether these can apply to another IPR.
机译:在过去的几年中,欧洲联盟法院已开始使用一种知识产权(IPR)的概念,即商标法,来裁决涉及其他IPR的案件,即外观设计和版权。本文分析了这种判例法。它表明,在某些情况下,这种做法是有道理的,而在另一些情况下,则是有争议的,甚至是放错地方了,并得出结论,在不仔细核实这些想法或推理是否可以从一个知识产权延伸到另一种时,总检察长和法院应保持警惕。申请另一个知识产权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号