首页> 外文期刊>European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience >The impact of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder on the treatment response of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder
【24h】

The impact of trauma and post-traumatic stress disorder on the treatment response of patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder

机译:创伤和创伤后应激障碍对强迫症患者治疗反应的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Few case series studies have addressed the issue of treatment response in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and there are no prospective studies addressing response to conventional treatment in OCD patients with a history of trauma (HT). The present study aimed to investigate, prospectively, the impact of HT or PTSD on two systematic, first-line treatments for OCD. Two hundred and nineteen non-treatment-resistant OCD outpatients were treated with either group cognitive-behavioral therapy (GCBT n = 147) or monotherapy with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI n = 72). Presence of HT and PTSD were assessed at intake, as part of a broader clinical and demographical baseline characterization of the sample. Severity and types of OCD symptoms were assessed with the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) and the Dimensional YBOCS (DYBOCS), respectively. Depression and anxiety symptoms were measured with the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Both treatments had 12-week duration. Treatment response was considered as a categorical [35% or greater reduction in baseline YBOCS scores plus a Clinical Global Impression-Improvement rating of better (2) or much better (1)] and continuous variable (absolute number reduction in baseline YBOCS scores). Treatment response was compared between the OCD + HT group versus the OCD without HT group and between the OCD + PTSD group versus the OCD without PTSD group. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used when indicated. Data on HT and PTSD were available for 215 subjects. Thirty-eight subjects (17.67% of the whole sample) had a positive HT (OCD + HT group) and 22 subjects (57.89% of the OCD + HT group and 10.23% of the whole sample) met full DSM-IV criteria for PTSD. The OCD + HT and OCD without HT groups presented similar response to GCBT (60% of responders in the first group and 63% of responders in the second group, p = 1.00). Regarding SSRI treatment, the difference between the response of the OCD + HT (47.4%) and OCD without HT (22.2%) groups was marginally significant (p = 0.07). In addition, the OCD + PTSD group presented a greater treatment response than the OCD without PTSD group when treatment response was considered as a continuous variable (p = 0.01). The age when the first trauma occurred had no impact on treatment response. In terms of specific OCD symptom dimensions, as measured by the DYBOCS, OCD treatment fostered greater reductions for the OCD + PTSD group than for the OCD without PTSD group in the scores of contamination obsessions and cleaning compulsions, collecting and hoarding and miscellaneous obsessions and related compulsions (including illness concerns and mental rituals, among others). The OCD + PTSD group also presented a greater reduction in anxiety scores than the OCD without PTSD group (p = 0.003). The presence of HT or PTSD was not related to a poorer treatment response in this sample of non-treatment-resistant OCD patients. Unexpectedly, OCD patients with PTSD presented a greater magnitude of response when compared with OCD without PTSD patients in specific OCD symptom dimensions. Future studies are needed to clarify if trauma and PTSD have a more significant impact on the onset and clinical expression of OCD than on the conventional treatment for this condition, and whether OCD stemming from trauma would constitute a subtype of OCD with a distinct response to conventional treatment.
机译:很少有病例系列研究解决强迫症(OCD)和合并性创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)患者的治疗反应问题,并且尚无前瞻性研究针对具有以下病史的强迫症患者对常规治疗的反应创伤(HT)。本研究旨在前瞻性地研究HT或PTSD对OCD的两种系统,一线治疗的影响。 119名非治疗性强迫症门诊患者接受了认知行为疗法(GCBT n = 147)或选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI n = 72)的单药治疗。进食时评估HT和PTSD的存在,作为样品更广泛的临床和人口统计学基线特征的一部分。分别使用耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(YBOCS)和维度YBOCS(DYBOCS)评估了强迫症症状的严重程度和类型。用贝克抑郁量表(BDI)和贝克焦虑量表(BAI)来测量抑郁和焦虑症状。两种疗法的疗程均为12周。治疗反应被认为是分类的[基线YBOCS得分降低35%或更多,加上临床总体印象改善水平达到(2)或好得多(1)]和连续变量(基线YBOCS得分的绝对值降低)。比较了OCD + HT组与不使用HT组的OCD以及OCD + PTSD组与不使用PTSD组的OCD的治疗反应。指示时使用参数和非参数测试。 HT和PTSD的数据适用于215名受试者。 38名受试者(占总样本的17.67%)的HT(OCD + HT组)为阳性,22名受试者(占强迫症+ HT组的57.89%,占整个样本的10.23%)达到PTSD的DSM-IV完全标准。 OCD + HT和无HT组的OCD对GCBT的反应相似(第一组为60%,第二组为63%,p = 1.00)。关于SSRI治疗,OCD + HT(47.4%)与无HT的OCD(22.2%)组之间的反应差异很小(p = 0.07)。此外,当将治疗反应视为连续变量时,OCD + PTSD组比没有PTSD组的OCD表现出更大的治疗反应(p = 0.01)。第一次外伤发生的年龄对治疗反应没有影响。根据DYBOCS测量的特定OCD症状尺寸,与没有PTSD组的OCD相比,OCD治疗在污染物强迫和清洁强迫,收集和ho积以及杂物强迫症和相关方面的得分要高得多。强迫(包括疾病问题和精神仪式等)。与没有PTSD组的OCD相比,OCD + PTSD组的焦虑评分降低也更大(p = 0.003)。 HT或PTSD的存在与该非治疗耐药性OCD患者样本中较差的治疗反应无​​关。出乎意料的是,与没有PTSD的OCD相比,OCSD PTSD患者在特定的OCD症状方面表现出更大的反应幅度。需要进一步的研究来阐明创伤和创伤后应激障碍是否会对强迫症的发作和临床表达产生比常规治疗更显着的影响,以及源自创伤的强迫症是否会构成强迫症的一种亚型,对传统疾病有明显反应治疗。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号