首页> 外文期刊>Ethics & the environment >VAL PLUMWOOD AND ECOFEMINIST POLITICAL SOLIDARITY: STANDING WITH THE NATURAL OTHER
【24h】

VAL PLUMWOOD AND ECOFEMINIST POLITICAL SOLIDARITY: STANDING WITH THE NATURAL OTHER

机译:VAL PLUMWOOD与生态女性政治团结:与自然他人站在一起

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Val Plumwood has asserted that the appropriate stance toward the more-than-human world is not one of identification or unity, but of solidarity "in the political sense." But can the language of solidarity be extended or revised to articulate a particular kind of ethico-political relationship between humans and the more-than-human world? Can the term "political solidarity" be accurately and productively used to describe a relationship between humans and the more-than-human world in which humans and non-humans struggle together to alter ecosocially-oppres-sive states of affairs? What else is at stake in this question? The work of Plumwood prompts ecofeminism to attend to these inquiries. In this essay, the work of Plumwood is brought together with that of feminist political philosopher Sally Scholz, who offers a non-environmental account of political solidarity. This essay shows how both theorists, despite disagreement over whether non-humans can be "in" solidarity with the more-than-human world, intend that the concept of solidarity do the same sort of ethico-political work in achieving mutuality without hegemonic over-identification with the oppressed by the privileged. Then, to examine how solidarity between humans and the more-than-human world works "in action," the essay ends with a brief consideration of the shared political life of human and non-human actors in the direct-action forest defense movement of the Pacific Northwest.
机译:瓦尔·普拉姆伍德(Val Plumwood)断言,对超越人类的世界的适当立场不是认同或统一之一,而是“从政治意义上”的团结。但是,是否可以扩展或修订团结的语言,以阐明人类与非人类世界之间的一种特殊的伦理政治关系?能否准确而富有成效地使用“政治团结”一词来描述人类与非人类世界之间的关系,在这个世界中人类与非人类共同努力改变具有生态社会主义色彩的事务状态?这个问题还有什么其他风险? Plumwood的工作促使生态女权主义者参与这些询问。在本文中,Plumwood的著作与女权主义政治哲学家Sally Scholz的著作融合在一起,后者提出了政治环境的非环境解释。这篇文章表明,尽管对于非人类是否可以“团结”于人类以外的世界存在分歧,两位理论家仍打算如何在没有霸权主义的情况下实现团结的概念进行团结的政治政治工作。 -与被特权者压迫的认同。然后,为了检验人类与超越人类世界之间的团结如何在“实际行动中”发挥作用,本文以对人类和非人类参与者在森林的直接行动中的共同政治生活的简要思考作为结束。西北太平洋。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ethics & the environment》 |2009年第2期|3-21164|共20页
  • 作者

    CHAONE MALLORY;

  • 作者单位

    Environmental Philosophy at Villanova University;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 02:20:17

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号