首页> 外文期刊>Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science >Assessment of water exchange between a discharge region and the open sea - A comparison of different methodological concepts
【24h】

Assessment of water exchange between a discharge region and the open sea - A comparison of different methodological concepts

机译:排放区与公海之间水交换的评估-不同方法论概念的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two different methods of estimating the water exchange through the Baltic coastal region of Laxemar have been used, consisting of particle trajectories and passive tracers. Water is traced from and to a small discharge region near the coast. The discharge material in this region is treated as zero-dimensional particles or tracers with neutral buoyancy. The real discharge material could be a leakage of radio-nuclides through the sea floor from an underground repository of nuclear waste. Water exchange rates between the discharge region and the model domain are estimated using both forward and backward trajectories as well as passive tracers. The Lagrangian trajectories can account for the time evolution of the water exchange while the tracers give one average age per model grid box. Water exchange times such as residence time, age and transient times have been calculated with trajectories but only the average age (AvA) for tracers. The trajectory calculations provide a more detailed time evolution than the tracers. On the other hand the tracers are integrated "on-line" simultaneously in the sea circulation model with the same time step while the Lagrangian trajectories are integrated "off-line" from the stored model velocities with its inherent temporal resolution, presently 1 h. The sub-grid turbulence is parameterised as the Laplacian diffusion for the passive tracers and with an extra stochastic velocity for trajectories. The importance of the parameterised sub-grid turbulence for the trajectories is estimated to give an extra diffusion of the same order as the Laplacian diffusion by comparing the Lagrangian dispersions with and without parameterisation. The results of the different methods are similar but depend on the chosen diffusivity coefficient with a slightly higher correlation between trajectories and tracers when integrated with a lower diffusivity coefficient.
机译:已使用两种不同的方法估算通过Laxemar的波罗的海沿岸地区的水交换,包括颗粒轨迹和被动示踪剂。在海岸附近的一个小排泄区有水可追溯。该区域中的放电材料被视为零维粒子或具有中性浮力的示踪剂。真正的排放物质可能是放射性核素从地下核废料储存库通过海底泄漏。排放区域和模型域之间的水交换速率是使用前进和后退轨迹以及被动示踪剂估算的。拉格朗日轨迹可以解释水交换的时间演变,而示踪剂则每个模型网格框给出一个平均年龄。交换时间(例如停留时间,年龄和过渡时间)已通过轨迹进行了计算,但仅使用示踪剂的平均年龄(AvA)。轨迹计算比跟踪器提供了更详细的时间演变。另一方面,示踪剂在同一时间步长同时在海洋环流模型中“在线”集成,而拉格朗日轨迹从存储的模型速度及其当前固有的时间分辨率(当前为1 h)“离线”集成。对于无源示踪剂,子网格湍流的参数设置为拉普拉斯扩散,对于轨迹具有额外的随机速度。通过比较带参数化和不带参数化的拉格朗日色散,估计了参数化子网格湍流对于轨迹的重要性,从而给出了与拉普拉斯扩散相同阶数的额外扩散。不同方法的结果相似,但取决于所选的扩散系数,当与较低的扩散系数集成时,轨迹和示踪剂之间的相关性会稍高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号