首页> 外文期刊>Ergonomics >Interaction-centred design: an end user evaluation of road intersection concepts developed using the cognitive work analysis design toolkit (CWA-DT)
【24h】

Interaction-centred design: an end user evaluation of road intersection concepts developed using the cognitive work analysis design toolkit (CWA-DT)

机译:以互动为中心的设计:使用认知工作分析设计工具包(CWA-DT)开发的道路交叉路口概念的最终用户评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Crashes at intersections represent an important road safety problem. Interactions between different road user types, such as between vehicles and vulnerable road users, are a particular concern. It has been suggested driver-centric road design plays a role in crashes. A multi-road user evaluation of three novel intersection designs is described. The designs were generated using the Cognitive Work Analysis Design Toolkit, underpinned by sociotechnical systems theory. The desktop evaluation involved drivers, motorcyclists, cyclists and pedestrians rating the design concepts against alignment with design goals, sociotechnical systems theory and usability, and providing feedback on the positive and negative aspects. Two concepts received more positive ratings and feedback in comparison to a concept that provided more user autonomy. The evaluation results also highlight clear differences in needs across road user groups. The design and evaluation process demonstrates how sociotechnical systems values and principles can be applied in the design of public spaces. Practitioner Summary:This study involved a participatory evaluation of novel road intersection designs, based on sociotechnical systems theory. The results identified important differences in needs and preferences across road user groups and demonstrate the value of sociotechnical systems theory and user participation in road transport design and evaluation processes.
机译:交叉路口的崩溃代表了一个重要的道路安全问题。不同道路用户类型之间的相互作用,例如车辆和易受攻击的道路用户,是特别关注的。它已被提出以驾驶员为中心的道路设计在崩溃中发挥作用。描述了三种新型交叉点设计的多路用户评估。使用认知工作分析设计工具包生成设计,由社会科技系统理论为基础。桌面评估涉及司机,摩托车手,骑自行车者和行人评级设计概念,以与设计目标,社会科学系统理论和可用性的对齐,并提供有关积极和消极方面的反馈。与提供更多用户自主权的概念相比,两个概念获得了更多的积极评级和反馈。评估结果还突出了道路用户组需求的清晰差异。设计和评估过程展示了社会科学系统的价值和原则如何应用于公共空间的设计。从业者摘要:本研究涉及基于社会科学系统理论的新型道路交叉设计的参与性评估。结果确定了道路用户组的需求和偏好的重要差异,并展示了社会科学系统理论的价值和用户参与公路运输设计和评估过程。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ergonomics》 |2020年第10期|1221-1239|共19页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Sunshine Coast Ctr Human Factors & Sociotech Syst Locked Bag 4 Maroochydore 4558 Australia;

    Univ Sunshine Coast Ctr Human Factors & Sociotech Syst Locked Bag 4 Maroochydore 4558 Australia;

    Univ Sunshine Coast Ctr Human Factors & Sociotech Syst Locked Bag 4 Maroochydore 4558 Australia;

    Univ Sunshine Coast Ctr Human Factors & Sociotech Syst Locked Bag 4 Maroochydore 4558 Australia;

    Monash Univ Accident Res Ctr Clayton Vic Australia;

    Univ Sunshine Coast Ctr Human Factors & Sociotech Syst Locked Bag 4 Maroochydore 4558 Australia;

    Heriot Watt Univ Sch Energy Geosci Infrastruct & Soc Edinburgh Midlothian Scotland;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Sociotechnical systems theory; design; road safety; intersections; end user evaluation;

    机译:SocioTechnical Systems理论;设计;道路安全;交叉路口;最终用户评估;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 21:22:10

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号