...
首页> 外文期刊>ERA Forum >Some Reflections on the Right to Self-representation Before International Tribunals
【24h】

Some Reflections on the Right to Self-representation Before International Tribunals

机译:关于国际法庭上自我代表权的一些思考

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The right to self-representation forms a part of the fair trial guarantees vital to every criminal proceeding. The accused, an individual human being, is to stand in the centre of his own trial, i.e. as a subject not an object of the proceedings. On the other hand, a fair trial also calls for the existence of equality of arms. As judicial procedures tend to be hard to grasp in their entirety for an accused not trained in a legal profession the right to self-representation has its barriers were the complexity of the case demands the accused to be assisted and/or represented by a counsel, even against his will. By the same token, where an accused due to his own behaviour obstructs the expeditious and effective carriage of the proceedings the interests of justice can necessitate the limitation or even the waiver of the right to self-representation. The difficulties to define and limit the right to self-representation in an adequate manner have been subject to a constant debate before the ad hoc Criminal Tribunals. The author highlights the cornerstones of this development thus illustrating the delicate balancing act between the conflicting interests involved.
机译:自我代表权是公平审判的一部分,对每项刑事诉讼程序都至关重要。被告是个人,应站在自己审判的中心,即作为被告而不是诉讼的对象。另一方面,公正的审判也要求存在武器平等。对于未经法律专业培训的被告,司法程序往往难以全面掌握,由于案件的复杂性要求辩护律师协助和/或代理人,自我代表权存在障碍。即使违背他的意愿。同样,如果被告由于其自身的行为而阻碍了对程序的迅速有效的进行,那么出于司法利益的考虑,则有必要限制甚至放弃自我代表权。特设刑事法庭一直在不停地辩论以适当方式界定和限制自我代表权的困难。作者强调了这一发展的基石,从而说明了所涉及的利益冲突之间的微妙的平衡行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号