首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Values >Participation(s) in Transnational Environmental Governance: Green Values Versus Instrumental Use
【24h】

Participation(s) in Transnational Environmental Governance: Green Values Versus Instrumental Use

机译:参与跨国环境治理:绿色价值与乐器使用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As crucial elements of green ideology, political participation and inclusiveness have become indispensable to democratic decision-making as green values gained ground across the world. It is often assumed that through the inclusion and participation of more stakeholders, the globalenvironmental governance architecture has become increasingly democratic since the 1990s. This article asks whether civil society participation in the relevant United Nations platforms democratises transnational and global environmental governance, or simply simulates democratic participationwithout giving stakeholders the chance to contribute to policy decisions. First, building on Hannah Arendt's concept of political action I differentiate forms of participation based on different value systems. Then, following the historical development of participation narratives in the UnitedNations, I argue that participation has become increasingly instrumentalised and used to conceal other types of institutional change based on efficiency considerations and neoliberal values.
机译:作为绿色意识形态的关键要素,政治参与和包容性使民主决策不可或缺,因为绿色价值观在世界范围内获得了基础。通常假设通过纳入和参与更多利益攸关方,自20世纪90年代以来,全球环境治理架构已成为越来越民主的。本文询问民间社会是否参与联合国有关的平台跨国和全球环境治理,或者只是模拟民主参与,使利益相关者有助于为政策决定做出贡献。首先,在汉娜建立汉娜的政治行动概念我根据不同的价值制度区分参与形式。然后,在联合国参与叙述的历史发展之后,我认为参与越来越多地有限公司,以掩盖基于效率考虑和新自由主义的其他类型的制度变革。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号