首页> 外文期刊>Environmental toxicology and chemistry >Comparison of Acute and Chronic Toxicity Laboratory Bioassay Endpoints with Benthic Community Responses in Field-Exposed Contaminated Sediments
【24h】

Comparison of Acute and Chronic Toxicity Laboratory Bioassay Endpoints with Benthic Community Responses in Field-Exposed Contaminated Sediments

机译:急性和慢性毒性实验室生物测定终点与底虫群落污染沉积物的反应比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Sediment toxicity is usually assessed by conducting laboratory bioassays on thoroughly homogenized, field-collected, sediment samples. Although it is generally held that these bioassays provide a conservative assessment of the potential for environmental impact, there are few studies comparing the results of laboratory sediment bioassays with actual measures of benthic community health in exposed field populations. To help inform an understanding of the relative efficacy of laboratory-based bioassays in predicting potential impacts in exposed field populations, a laboratory-to-field comparison study was conducted. Laboratory bioassays included standard 10-d acute toxicity tests measuring survival in 4 species of estuarine/marine amphipods (Eohaustorius estuarius, Ampelisca abdita, Rhepoxinius abronius, and Leptocheirus plumulosus) and 2 longer term, 28-d sublethal tests with a marine polychaete, Neanthes arenaceodentata (survival and growth), and the amphipod L. plumulosus (survival, growth, and reproduction). A highly contaminated and toxic sediment was mixed with a cleaner sediment of similar grain size to produce a series of diluted contaminated sediment treatments (0, 6, 12, 25, and 50%). Sediment treatments were placed in containers and deployed in the field. At specified intervals (at time of deployment and 9 and 12 mo post deployment), containers were retrieved from the field and analyzed for sediment chemistry, infaunal community composition, and toxicity. Laboratory toxicity endpoints were compared with measures of benthic community health to evaluate the ability of the toxicity tests to accurately predict benthic impacts. The results of these comparisons indicate that the laboratory tests evaluated provide conservative estimates of potential benthic community impacts, with both acute and chronic tests detecting effects at lower treatment levels than were detected in exposed field populations using traditional measures of benthic community health. Environ Toxicol Chem 2019;38:1784-1802. Published 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of SETAC. This article is a US government work, and as such, is in the public domain in the United States of America.
机译:通常通过在彻底的均质化,田间收集的沉积物样品上进行实验室生物测定来评估沉积物毒性。虽然普遍认为,这些生物测定剂提供了对环境影响潜力的保守评估,但很少有研究结果比较了实验室沉积物生物测定的结果,并在暴露的野外群体中具有实际措施的终体群落健康的实际测量。为了帮助了解基于实验室的生物测定在预测暴露的野外群体中的潜在影响的情况下,进行了理解,进行了实验室到现场对比研究。实验室生物测定包括标准的10-D急性毒性试验测量4种河口/海洋Amphipods(Eohaustorius estuarius,Ampelisca Abdita,rhepoxinius Abronius和Leptocheirus Plumulosus)和2个长期,28-d与海洋多档,厄恩特斯的核糖试验arenaceodentata(生存和生长),以及Amphipod L.羽毛(生存,生长和繁殖)。将高度污染和有毒的沉积物与类似晶粒尺寸的清洁沉积物混合,以产生一系列稀释的污染沉积物处理(​​0,6,12,25和50%)。将沉积物处理置于容器中并在该领域部署。以指定的间隔(在部署时和9和12个MO后部署时),从场上检索容器,并分析沉积物化学,婴儿群落组成和毒性。将实验室毒性终点与底栖群落健康的措施进行了比较,以评估毒性测试能力,以准确预测底栖影响。这些比较结果表明,评估的实验室试验为潜在的底栖群落影响提供了保守估计,急性和慢性试验在使用传统的底栖社区健康中检测到较低治疗水平的效果。环境毒素科学2019; 38:1784-1802。发布2019年Wiley期刊,Inc。代表Setac。本文是美国政府工作,因此,在美利坚合众国的公共领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号