首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Science & Technology >Acute Gastrointestinal Illness Risks in North Carolina Community Water Systems: A Methodological Comparison
【24h】

Acute Gastrointestinal Illness Risks in North Carolina Community Water Systems: A Methodological Comparison

机译:北卡罗莱纳州社区供水系统的急性胃肠道疾病风险:方法学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The magnitude and spatial variability of acute gastrointestinal illness (AGI) cases attributable to microbial contamination of U.S. community drinking water systems are not well characterized. We compared three approaches (drinking water attributable risk, quantitative microbial risk assessment, and population intervention model) to estimate the annual number of emergency department visits for AGI attributable to microorganisms in North Carolina community water systems. All three methods used 2007-2013 water monitoring and emergency department data obtained from state agencies. The drinking water attributable risk method, which was the basis for previous U.S. Environmental Protection Agency national risk assessments, estimated that 7.9% of annual emergency department visits for AGI are attributable-to microbial contamination of community water systems. However, the other methods' estimates were more than 2 orders of magnitude lower, each attributing 0.04796 of annual emergency department visits for AGI to community water system contamination. The differences in results between the drinking water attributable risk method, which has been the main basis for previous national risk estimates, and the other two approaches highlight the need to improve methods for estimating endemic waterborne disease risks, in order to prioritize investments to improve community drinking water systems.
机译:由于美国社区饮用水系统的微生物污染所致的急性胃肠道疾病(AGI)病例的大小和空间变异性尚未得到很好的表征。我们比较了三种方法(饮用水归因风险,定量微生物风险评估和人口干预模型),以估算北卡罗来纳州社区供水系统中每年归因于微生物的AGI急诊科就诊次数。这三种方法都使用了从国家机构获得的2007-2013年水监测和急诊部门数据。饮用水归因风险法是美国环境保护局先前进行的国家风险评估的基础,估计每年急诊科就AGI进行的拜访有7.9%归因于社区供水系统的微生物污染。但是,其他方法的估计值要低两个数量级以上,每种方法都将AGI年度急诊部门就诊的0.04796归因于社区供水系统的污染。饮用水归因风险法是过去国家风险评估的主要依据,其结果之间的差异与另外两种方法之间的差异突出了需要改进估计地方性水传播疾病风险的方法,以便优先投资以改善社区饮用水系统。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Science & Technology》 |2015年第16期|10019-10027|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, United States;

    Division of Environmental Health, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089, United States;

    Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:59:48

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号