首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Politics >The ethics of climate politics: four modes of moral discourse
【24h】

The ethics of climate politics: four modes of moral discourse

机译:气候政治伦理:道德话语的四种模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article argues that James Gustafson's 'modes of moral discourse' framework is highly valuable for conceptualising the ethics of climate politics, or 'climate ethics'. The moral-philosophical task of developing principles of climate justice, or the issue of how the burdens (and benefits) of global climate change should be distributed between and within generations, is essential to climate ethics, but it is also insufficient. Climate ethics should avoid focusing too exclusively on '(technical-)ethical' discourse, but also incorporate insights from 'narrative', 'policy', and 'prophetic' discourses about or relevant to climate change politics. Climate ethics is to be conceived as pluralist: broad and interdisciplinary, but presumably conflictual and tragic as well.
机译:本文认为,詹姆斯·古斯塔夫森(James Gustafson)的“道德话语模式”框架对于概念化气候政治伦理学或“气候伦理学”具有很高的价值。发展气候正义原则的道德哲学任务,或如何在世代之间和世代之间分配全球气候变化的负担(和利益)的问题,对于气候伦理至关重要,但这还不够。气候伦理应避免过于专注于“(技术)伦理”话语,而应吸收有关气候变化政治或与之相关的“叙事”,“政策”和“预言”话语的见解。气候伦理应被视为多元主义:广泛和跨学科的,但也可能是冲突的和悲剧的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号