首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Monitoring and Assessment >Estimating soil heavy metals concentration at large scale using visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy
【24h】

Estimating soil heavy metals concentration at large scale using visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy

机译:使用可见和近红外反射光谱法大规模估计土壤重金属浓度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This study was aimed (i) to examine using diffuse reflectance spectra within VNIR region to estimate soil heavy metals concentrations at large scale, (ii) to compare the influence of different pre-processing models on predictive model accuracy, and (iii) to explore the best predictive models. A number of 325 topsoil samples were collected and their spectral data, pH, clay content, organic matter, Ni, and Cu concentrations were determined. To improve spectral data, various pre-processing methods including Savitzky-Golay smoothing filter, Savitzky-Golay smoothing filter with first and second derivatives, and standard normal variant (SNV) were used. Partial least squares regression (PLSR), principal component regression (PCR), and support vector machine regression (SVMR) models were employed to build calibration models for estimating soil heavy metals concentration followed by evaluation of provided predictive models. Results indicated that Cu had stronger correlation coefficients with spectral bands compared to Ni. Cu and Ni demonstrated strongest correlations at wavelengths 1925 and 1393 nm, respectively. Based on RMSE, R (2), and RPD statistics, the PLSR model with Savitzky-Golay filter pretreatment provided the most accurate predictions for both Cu and Ni (R (2) = 0.905, RMSE = 0.00123, RPD = 2.80 for Ni; R (2) = 0.825, RMSE = 0.00467, RPD = 2.04 for Cu) where such prediction was much better for Ni than for Cu. Reasonable results with lower accuracy and stability were obtained for PCR (R (2) = 0.742, RMSE = 0.00181, RPD = 1.91 for Ni; R (2) = 0.731, RMSE = 0.00578, RPD = 1.65 for Cu) and SVMR (R (2) = 0.643, RMSE = 0.00091, RPD = 3.80 for Ni; R (2) = 0.505, RMSE = 0.00296, RPD = 3.22 for Cu). We concluded that reflectance spectroscopy technique could be applied as a reliable tool for detection and prediction of soil heavy metals.
机译:这项研究的目的是(i)使用VNIR区域内的漫反射光谱来评估土壤中重金属的大规模浓度;(ii)比较不同预处理模型对预测模型准确性的影响;以及(iii)探索最好的预测模型。收集了325个表土样品,并测定了其光谱数据,pH,粘土含量,有机质,Ni和Cu浓度。为了改善光谱数据,使用了各种预处理方法,包括Savitzky-Golay平滑滤波器,具有一阶和二阶导数的Savitzky-Golay平滑滤波器以及标准正态变量(SNV)。使用偏最小二乘回归(PLSR),主成分回归(PCR)和支持向量机回归(SVMR)模型来建立用于估计土壤重金属浓度的校准模型,然后评估所提供的预测模型。结果表明,与Ni相比,Cu与光谱带的相关系数更强。 Cu和Ni分别在1925和1393 nm波长处表现出最强的相关性。基于RMSE,R(2)和RPD统计数据,采用Savitzky-Golay滤波器预处理的PLSR模型提供了对Cu和Ni的最准确预测(R(2)= 0.905,RMSE = 0.00123,镍的RPD = 2.80; R(2)= 0.825,对于铜,RMSE = 0.00467,RPD = 2.04),其中镍的这种预测要好于铜。对于PCR(Ni的R(2)= 0.742,RMSE = 0.00181,RPD = 1.91;对于Cu,R(2)= 0.731,RMSE = 0.00578,RPD = 1.65)和SVMR(R,获得了较低准确度和稳定性的合理结果。 (2)= 0.643,RMSE = 0.00091,镍的RPD = 3.80; R(2)= 0.505,RMSE = 0.00296,铜的RPD = 3.22)。我们得出结论,反射光谱技术可以用作检测和预测土壤重金属的可靠工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号