首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Management >Landowner Perceptions of Payments for Nature Conservation on Private Land
【24h】

Landowner Perceptions of Payments for Nature Conservation on Private Land

机译:土地所有者对私人土地的自然保护付款的看法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Private land conservation (PLC) programs often provide financial incentives to motivate and enable landowners to engage in conservation. However, few studies have explored the psychological and management impacts of these incentives. We interviewed 50 landowners in Tasmania, Australia who were engaged in incentivised or nonincentivised PLC programs. Landowners who received incentives were paid to either protect private land through creating a conservation covenant (a legal deed restricting land uses) or engage in a specific stewardship activity (e.g., planting trees). Most landowners who received payments to create covenants stated that they would not have done so without the payment. However, landowners, including those who have purchased or inherited covenanted properties, also indicated that neither these payments, nor the conservation covenant made any significant impact on how they managed the land. Covenant incentives did not improve attitudes towards conservation or conservationists. In contrast, most landowners receiving stewardship payments reported that these payments enabled the conservation actions they valued, helped build relationships and promoted favorable attitudes towards conservation. Contextual factors that influenced the impact of financial incentives on conservation action included the quality of relationship between landowners and stewardship officers, availability of private funds for conservation, and multigenerational aspirations. Our research identifies some of the intended and unintended impacts of financial incentives and describes how a fuller understanding of the motivations, identities, and aspirations of landowners may lead to the design of more socially resilient and ecologically effective PLC programs.
机译:私人土地保护(PLC)计划经常提供促进和使土地所有者能够进行保护的财务激励措施。然而,很少有研究探索了这些激励措施的心理和管理影响。我们采访了澳大利亚塔斯马尼亚州的50个土地所有者,他们从事激励或非委托的PLC计划。通过创建一个保护契约(法律契约限制土地使用)或参与特定的管理活动(例如,种植树木),获得受奖励的土地所有者。大多数收到契约的土地所有者指出,如果没有付款,他们就没有这样做。然而,包括那些购买或继承的人的土地所有者也表明这些付款也没有对他们的管理方式产生任何重大影响。盟约激励措施并未改善对保护或保护主义者的态度。相比之下,大多数土地所有者收到管理支付​​报告说,这些付款使他们有重视的保护行动,帮助建立关系并促进了对保护的良好态度。影响金融激励对保护行动影响的背景因素包括土地所有者和管理人员之间的关系,保护私人资金和维护的私人资金和多才愿望。我们的研究确定了财务激励措施的一些预期和意外影响,并描述了如何更充分地了解土地所有者的动机,身份和愿望,可能导致设计更具社会弹性和生态有效的PLC计划。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environmental Management》 |2019年第3期|287-302|共16页
  • 作者单位

    Quest Univ Canada Social Sci 3200 Univ Blvd Squamish BC V8B 0N8 Canada|Univ Tasmania Discipline Geog & Spatial Sci Private Bag 78 Hobart Tas 7001 Australia;

    Univ Tasmania Discipline Geog & Spatial Sci Private Bag 78 Hobart Tas 7001 Australia;

    Univ Tasmania Discipline Geog & Spatial Sci Private Bag 78 Hobart Tas 7001 Australia;

    Univ Tasmania Discipline Geog & Spatial Sci Private Bag 78 Hobart Tas 7001 Australia;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Self-Determination Theory; Sustainable farming; PES; Conservation psychology; Crowding-out; Easement;

    机译:自决理论;可持续农业;PES;保护心理学;挤出;地役权;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 21:49:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号