...
首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Law and Management >Who 'holds' the working papers of the 'climategate' inquiry?
【24h】

Who 'holds' the working papers of the 'climategate' inquiry?

机译:谁“持有”“气候门”调查的工作文件?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In 2009 someone hacked into e-mails belonging to the Climate Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) and leaked them widely. Climate change sceptics whooped with delight because they thought that the e-mails showed attempts to suppress or gerrymander climate data (see for example James Delingpole~2 with some of the ticklish e-mails, and for more background, less tendentiously put, my post on an earlier UEA case). And the CRU data was important; it had made its way into the highly influential IPCC reports. UEA understandably thought that something needed doing in response to the leaks, and commissioned an inquiry, the Independent Climate Change E-mail Review. ICCER reported in 2010, concluding that there had not been any systematic manipulation of data, although there had been a lack of openness by CRU in dealing with requests for information.
机译:2009年,有人入侵了东英吉利大学(UEA)气候研究部门(CRU)的电子邮件,并将其大量泄漏。对气候变化持怀疑态度的人欢呼雀跃,因为他们认为这些电子邮件显示了试图抑制或加倍加气的气候数据(例如,James Delingpole〜2带有一些棘手的电子邮件,关于更多背景信息,我的帖子则比较宽松)在较早的UEA案例中)。而且,CRU数据很重要。它已进入极具影响力的IPCC报告。可以理解的是,UEA认为需要采取一些措施来应对泄漏,因此委托进行了一次调查,即《独立气候变化电子邮件审核》。 ICCER在2010年进行了报告,得出结论认为,尽管CRU在处理信息请求方面缺乏开放性,但没有对数据进行任何系统的操纵。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号