首页> 外文期刊>Environmental Conservation >The classification of the sciences and the quest for interdisciplinarity: a brief history of ideas from ancient philosophy to contemporary environmental science
【24h】

The classification of the sciences and the quest for interdisciplinarity: a brief history of ideas from ancient philosophy to contemporary environmental science

机译:科学的分类和对跨学科的追求:从古代哲学到当代环境科学的简短思想史

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Burgeoning acquisition of information about the workings, scope and diversities of the cosmos put serious pressure on 19th-century European intellectuals to classify branches of human knowledge. A challenge presented itself not only to order different subject-areas and disciplines intelligently, or assess them according to apparent degrees of certitude, but also to discover some synthesizing principle by which all the distinctive methods of approaching the world might be viewed in interrelationship. This review shows that such endeavours to classify and unify were traditional procedures, with deep roots going back to antiquity, and they brought coherence to academic programmes through the centuries. As a mark of European modernity, there was a tendency to establish more rational, scientific and secular principles of order, and the consequent tensions between positivistic and holistic styles of approach to science have continued since. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, it is also recognized, the constant subdividing of academic agendas has made the work of classification much less manageable and attractive. If traditional principles to express the unity of knowledge were philosophical, or, in the case of the medieval universities, evoked the oneness of the divine Creation, it is intriguing how planetary survivalism in the present time has pushed environmental science centre-stage as a pivotal point of activity encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration. If varying consideration has been granted to practical subjects (for example agriculture) in the history of knowledge classification, their importance has been clarified by current biospheric predicaments.
机译:大量获取有关宇宙的工作,范围和多样性的信息给19世纪的欧洲知识分子带来了巨大压力,要求他们对人类知识的各个分支进行分类。面临的挑战不仅是如何智能地对不同的学科领域和学科进行排序,或者根据明显的可信度进行评估,而且还发现了一种综合原理,通过这种原理,人们可以在相互关系中看待所有与众不同的方法。这篇评论表明,这种分类和统一的努力是传统的程序,其根源可以追溯到上古,并且在整个世纪以来都为学术课程带来了连贯性。作为欧洲现代性的标志,人们倾向于建立更合理,科学和世俗的秩序原则,此后,实证主义和整体主义科学方法之间的紧张关系一直在持续。从二十世纪初开始,人们也认识到,学术议程的不断细分使分类工作变得不那么容易管理和有吸引力。如果说表达知识统一性的传统原则是哲学性的,或者在中世纪的大学中,它唤起了神圣创造的统一性,那么,当今的行星生存主义如何将环境科学作为一个关键问题推向了中心舞台,这很有趣。鼓励跨学科合作的活动点。如果在知识分类的历史中对实用学科(例如农业)给予了不同的考虑,那么当前的生物圈困境已经阐明了它们的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号