...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >State Enforcement Action Is No Bar To RCRA Citizen Suit, Seventh Circuit Says
【24h】

State Enforcement Action Is No Bar To RCRA Citizen Suit, Seventh Circuit Says

机译:第七巡回法庭称,国家执法行动对RCRA公民诉讼无害

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A federal appeals court held May 3 that a citizen suit under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act may proceed even though a state agency filed enforcement actions against the same alleged violators, including a state court lawsuit filed before the citizen suit (Adkins v. VIM Recycling Inc., 7th Cir., No. 10-2237,5/3/11). In its decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit said a federal district court erred in ruling that RCRA precluded the citizen suit and abused its discretion in failing to exercise jurisdiction by relying on the federal abstention doctrine.
机译:联邦上诉法院于5月3日裁定,即使州机构针对相同的涉嫌违反者提起执法行动,包括根据提起民事诉讼的州法院诉讼,也可能会根据《资源保护和恢复法》提起民事诉讼(Adkins诉VIM回收) Inc.,第7卷,编号10-2237,5 / 3/11)。美国第七巡回上诉法院在判决中说,联邦地方法院裁定RCRA排除了公民诉讼,并滥用其酌处权,以不依靠联邦弃权学说行使管辖权。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter 》 |2011年第18期| p.988-990| 共3页
  • 作者

    Peter Quinn;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号