首页> 外文期刊>Environment reporter >Judge Suggests EPA Petition, Not Citizen Suit, Is Proper Course on Factory Farm Emissions
【24h】

Judge Suggests EPA Petition, Not Citizen Suit, Is Proper Course on Factory Farm Emissions

机译:法官建议,EPA呈请而非公民诉讼是针对工厂农场排放的正确课程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A panel of federal appeals court judges appeared skeptical of a lawsuit filed by four Iowa residents who are seeking a court order to compel the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate air pollution from animal feeding operations, with one judge suggesting that they should have instead directly petitioned the agency (Zoofe v. EPA, D.C. Cir., No. 14-5187, oral arguments 4/2/15). Wallace Taylor, an attorney with the Wallace Taylor law firm in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, argued April 2 that the plaintiff-appellants weren't required to go through the petition for rulemaking process in order to challenge the EPA's inaction on the regulation of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from concentrated animal feeding operations.
机译:联邦上诉法院法官小组似乎对四名衣阿华州居民提起的诉讼表示怀疑,这些居民正在寻求法院命令,以迫使环境保护署对动物饲养活动造成的空气污染进行监管,一位法官建议他们应该直接向法院起诉。代理机构(Zoofe诉EPA,DC Cir。,第14-5187号,口头辩论4/2/15)。爱荷华州锡达拉皮兹市华莱士·泰勒律师事务所的律师华莱士·泰勒(Wallace Taylor)于4月2日辩称,不需要原告上诉人通过规则制定程序来挑战EPA对氨氮法规的不作为。集中饲养动物时产生的硫化氢排放量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号