【24h】

Sierra Club v. BNSF Ry.

机译:塞拉俱乐部v。 BNSF Ry。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Environmental groups have standing to bring Clean Water Act citizen suit claims alleging that railroad discharged coal into Washington's waterways without national pollutant discharge elimination system permit, because: (1) even though groups are seeking relief for waterways statewide, groups must only establish standing for representative number of waterways; (2) groups alleged sufficient facts to prove that they suffered injury in fact caused by railroad's discharges to certain waterways, that injuries are fairly traceable to railroad's actions, and that injuries are redressable by favorable decision; and (3) groups alleged sufficient facts to establish that waterways they demonstrated interest in provide concrete factual context to be representative of remaining waterways.
机译:环保团体有资格提起《清洁水法》公民诉讼,声称未经国家污染物排放消除系统许可,铁路将煤炭排放到华盛顿的水道,原因是:(1)即使团体在全州寻求水路救济,团体也只能为代表建立地位水道数量; (2)团体声称有充分的事实证明他们实际上是由于铁路向某些水道的排放所造成的伤害,这些伤害可以追溯到铁路的行为,并且可以通过有利的决定予以纠正; (3)团体声称有足够的事实证明他们对水道表现出兴趣,并提供了具体的事实背景来代表剩余的水道。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment reporter - Cases》 |2016年第8期|1556-1568|共13页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号