首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Creating a gap that can be filled: Constructing and territorializing the affordable housing submarket in Gauteng, South Africa
【24h】

Creating a gap that can be filled: Constructing and territorializing the affordable housing submarket in Gauteng, South Africa

机译:创造可以填补的空白:在南非豪登省建立和划分经济适用房子市场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

As the housing bubble burst in overheated property markets around the world, South Africa's so-called 'affordable housing market' appeared to be bucking the trend. From 2010, affordable housing prices were rising and selling quickly, especially in Gauteng, Johannesburg's city-region, chronically short of actually affordable housing and with a growing black middle class. Touted as 'SA's best-kept investment secret', the affordable housing market offered a lifeline to the property industry and the potential to democratize segregated property markets. Yet, in practice, the tapping of South Africa's lower-income housing market by capital has been a limited one, narrowly catering to particular subjects and spaces. Drawing on heterodox approaches to 'actually existing markets' and qualitative fieldwork conducted in Johannesburg between 2012 and 2013, this paper traces how the boundaries of the affordable housing and mortgage submarket are produced and shift through the investments of multiple communities with their own theories of housing markets and different interests in 'making the market work'. Despite these investments and contestations, the submarket is narrowly territorialized within developer-driven housing largely in Gauteng for public-sector workers, to optimize the market within mortgage capital's frameworks of risk, return, race and space. The South African mortgaged affordable housing submarket is not so much in need of market information or constitutive of a new frontier of global finance, as a territorial fix for domestic capital vis-a-vis development imperatives. To investigate struggles over this submarket, I draw together socio-institutional approaches to markets with critical political economy of housing markets and put them into conversation with critical development studies scholarship on markets. This combination allows us to make space for multiple projects of'improvement' and profit in our analyses of market-making, as well as how these are shaped by, and shape, space and conjuncture. I seek to contribute to a growing literature on the geographies of markets from a Global South context where housing is framed as both a market good and constitutional right by examining a case of apparent 'market failure'.
机译:随着全球过热的房地产市场的房地产泡沫破裂,南非所谓的“负担得起的房地产市场”似乎正在逆转这一趋势。从2010年开始,负担得起的住房价格迅速上涨并开始销售,尤其是在约翰内斯堡市区的豪登省,长期短缺实际负担得起的住房,并且中产阶级不断增多。经济适用房市场被吹捧为“ SA的最佳投资秘诀”,为房地产行业提供了生命线,并有可能使隔离的房地产市场民主化。然而,实际上,通过资本开发南非低收入住房市场一直是一个有限的过程,只能满足特定的主题和空间。借鉴2012年至2013年间在约翰内斯堡进行的“实际存在的市场”的异质方法和定性的实地调查,本文追溯了经济适用房和抵押贷款子市场的边界是如何产生的,以及如何通过具有自己住房理论的多个社区的投资而转变的市场和“使市场运作”的不同利益。尽管进行了这些投资和竞争,但子市场仍在豪登省的开发商驱动住房中狭窄地划分为公共部门工作人员,以在抵押资本的风险,回报,种族和空间框架内优化市场。南非抵押负担得起的住房子市场并不需要太多的市场信息或新的全球金融领域的构成,而将其作为国内资本与发展势在必行的地域定位。为了调查在这个子市场上的挣扎,我将社会制度方法结合到具有住房市场批判性政治经济学的市场上,并与有关市场的批判性发展研究奖学金进行了对话。这种结合使我们能够在做市分析中为“改进”和获利的多个项目腾出空间,以及这些项目的形成方式,形状,空间和连接方式。我试图通过研究一个明显的“市场失灵”案例,来为全球南方背景下不断增长的有关市场地理学的文献做出贡献,在南方背景下,住房被视为市场利益和宪法权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号