首页> 外文期刊>Environment and Planning. A >New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice, and research
【24h】

New agendas for appraisal: reflections on theory, practice, and research

机译:评估的新议程:对理论,实践和研究的反思

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Appraisal-defined here to include a variety of ex ante techniques and procedures that seek to predict and evaluate the consequences of certain human actions-has been afforded an increasingly important role in environmental policy. We argue in this paper, however, that both the nature of appraisal and its role in the political process have been inadequately conceptualised. Exploring a literature that has tended to polarise 'technical' and 'deliberative' models, we identify a need for sensitive selection and combination of approaches, taking account of both the object and the objective of appraisal in particular contexts. We suggest that an important role for appraisal (by design or by default) may be that of providing spaces for dialogue and learning in the making of policies and decisions. A better understanding of such processes requires further research, particularly well-designed longitudinal work involving retrospective and 'real time' studies of appraisal in practice.
机译:此处定义的评估包括各种旨在预测和评估某些人类行为的后果的事前技术和程序,在环境政策中,评估和评估的作用日益重要。但是,我们在本文中认为,评估的性质及其在政治进程中的作用都没有得到足够的概念化。在研究倾向于对“技术”和“审议”模型进行两极化的文献时,我们确定了敏感选择和方法组合的需求,同时考虑了特定情况下评估的目的和目的。我们建议评估(通过设计或默认方式)的重要作用可能是在制定政策和决策时为对话和学习提供空间。对此类过程的更好理解需要进一步的研究,特别是设计良好的纵向工作,其中包括对实践评估的回顾性和“实时”研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号