首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Geography, death, and finitude
【24h】

Geography, death, and finitude

机译:地理,死亡和局限性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Despite growing interest in the geographies of death, loss, and remembrance, comparatively little geographical research has been devoted either to the historical and cultural practices of death, or to an adequate conceptualisation of finitude. Responding to these absences, in this paper I argue for the importance of the notion of finitude within the history and philosophy of geographical thought. Situating finitude initially in the context of the work of Torsten Hagerstrand and Richard Hartshorne, the notion is argued to be both productive of a geographical ethics, and as epistemologically constitutive of phenomenological apprehensions of 'earth' and 'world'. In order to better grasp the sense and genealogy of finitude, I turn to the work of Martin Heidegger, Michel Foucault, and Georges Bataille. These authors are drawn upon precisely because their writings present powerful conceptual frameworks which demonstrate the intimate relations between spatiality, death, and finitude. At the same time, their writings are critically interrogated in the light of perhaps the most important aspect of the conceptual history of finitude: the way in which it has been articulated as a site of anthropocentric distinction. I argue for a critical deconstruction of this anthropocentric basis to finitude; a deconstruction which raises a series of profound questions over the ethics, normativities, and understandings of responsibility shaping contemporary ethical geographies of the human and non-human. In so doing, I demonstrate the geographical importance of the notion of finitude for a variety of arenas of debate which include: phenomenological understandings of spatiality; the biopolitical boundaries drawn between human and animal; and contemporary theorisations of corporeality, materiality, and hospitality.
机译:尽管人们对死亡,损失和纪念地域的兴趣日益浓厚,但相对较少的地理研究一直致力于死亡的历史和文化实践,或对有限性的充分概念化。针对这些缺失,在本文中,我主张有限概念在地理思想的历史和哲学中的重要性。最初在Torsten Hagerstrand和Richard Hartshorne的工作中将局限性放在首位,认为该概念既产生了地理伦理学,又是对“地球”和“世界”的现象学理解的认识论构成。为了更好地把握有限的意义和家谱,我转向马丁·海德格尔,米歇尔·福柯和乔治·巴泰勒的作品。吸引这些作者的原因恰恰是因为他们的作品提出了强大的概念框架,这些框架证明了空间性,死亡与有限性之间的密切关系。同时,从有限性概念史的最重要方面来看,他们的著作受到了严格的审问:以有限的方式将其表达为人类中心主义的场所。我主张将这种以人类为中心的基础进行批判性的解构,使其走向有限。这种解构主义引发了关于伦理,规范和责任理解的一系列深刻问题,这些问题影响着人类和非人类的当代伦理地理。通过这样做,我证明了有限性概念在各种辩论领域的地理重要性,这些领域包括:对空间性的现象学理解;人与动物之间的生物政治界限;以及关于物质性,物质性和款待的当代理论。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and planning》 |2011年第11期|p.2533-2553|共21页
  • 作者

    Jose Luis Romanillos;

  • 作者单位

    School of Geography, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4RJ, England;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号