...
首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Review essay: On the politics of our humanitarian present
【24h】

Review essay: On the politics of our humanitarian present

机译:评论文章:关于我们人道主义现状的政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Humanitarianism has become such a central feature of international politics over recent decades that we are in danger of taking it for granted. Yet not only is humanitarianism an increasingly popular, and by no means unproblematic, way in which Western citizens are invited to respond to the world around them; its ready purveyance of moral absolutes-we shall do something-is no less useful to their governments. There is a distinctly liberal moral geography at work here: emerging power humanitarianisms having neither the public airs nor quite the moral precepts attached to the endeavour in the West (though see Hirono and O'Hagan, 2012). But even if the dominant Western form of humanitarianism may constitute no settled doctrine itself, it does present a consistently fertile way of framing political issues in a moral vernacular and vice versa (for a helpful recent overview, see Collinson and Elhawary, 2012, pages 5-6; see also Barnett and Weiss, 2011).
机译:近几十年来,人道主义已经成为国际政治的中心特征,以至于我们有可能将其视为理所当然。然而,不仅人道主义越来越受到邀请,而且西方公民被邀请对周围的世界作出回应的方式越来越普遍,而且绝不是毫无问题。它可以随时提供道德上的绝对价值-我们将做些事情-对他们的政府同样有用。这里有一个明显的自由道德地理学:新兴的强国人道主义,既没有公开的风气,也没有西方努力所遵循的道德戒律(尽管请参见Hirono和O'Hagan,2012年)。但是,即使占主导地位的西方人道主义形式本身并不能构成解决的学说,它的确提供了一种始终如一的肥沃方式,以道德的白话来描述政治问题,反之亦然(有关近期的有益综述,请参阅Collinson和Elhawary,2012年,第5页) -6;另请参见Barnett和Weiss,2011年)。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Environment and planning 》 |2013年第4期| 753-760| 共8页
  • 作者

    Simon Reid-Henry;

  • 作者单位

    School of Geography, Queen Mary, University of London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, England and Peace Research Institute, Oslo, Hansmanns gate 7, 0186, Oslo, Norway;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号