首页> 外文期刊>Environment and planning >Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data
【24h】

Data colonialism through accumulation by dispossession: New metaphors for daily data

机译:通过剥夺积累的数据殖民主义:日常数据的新隐喻

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent years, much has been written on 'big data' in both the popular and academic press. After the hubristic declaration of the 'end of theory' more nuanced arguments have emerged, suggesting that increasingly pervasive data collection and quantification may have significant implications for the social sciences, even if the social, scientific, political, and economic agendas behind big data are less new than they are often portrayed. Compared to the boosterish tone of much of its press, academic critiques of big data have been relatively muted, often focusing on the continued importance of more traditional forms of domain knowledge and expertise. Indeed, many academic responses to big data enthusiastically celebrate the availability of new data sources and the potential for new insights and perspectives they may enable. Undermining many of these critiques is a lack of attention to the role of technology in society, particularly with respect to the labor process, the continued extension of labor relations into previously private times and places, and the commoditization of more and more aspects of everyday life. In this article, we parse a variety of big data definitions to argue that it is only when individual datums by the million, billion, or more are linked together algorithmically that 'big data' emerges as a commodity. Such decisions do not occur in a vacuum but as part of an asymmetric power relationship in which individuals are dispossessed of the data they generate in their day-to-day lives. We argue that the asymmetry of this data capture process is a means of capitalist 'accumulation by dispossession' that colonizes and commodifies everyday life in ways previously impossible. Situating the promises of 'big data' within the Utopian imaginaries of digital frontierism, we suggest processes of data colonialism are actually unfolding behind these utopic promises. Amid private corporate and academic excitement over new forms of data analysis and visualization, situating big data as a form of capitalist expropriation and dispossession stresses the urgent need for critical, theoretical understandings of data and society.
机译:近年来,流行和学术媒体都对“大数据”进行了大量写作。自暴自弃地宣布“理论的终结”之后,出现了更为细致入微的争论,这表明日益普及的数据收集和量化可能对社会科学产生重大影响,即使大数据背后的社会,科学,政治和经济议程正在比通常描述的要新。相较于其大多数媒体的乐观态度,大数据的学术批评相对较为冷淡,通常集中于对领域知识和专业知识的更传统形式的持续重要性。确实,许多学术界对大数据的回应都热烈庆祝新数据源的可用性以及它们可能带来的新见解和观点的潜力。削弱了许多批评的是缺乏对技术在社会中的作用的关注,特别是在劳动过程方面,劳动关系继续扩展到以前的私人时间和地方,以及日常生活中越来越多的商品化。在本文中,我们将分析各种大数据定义,以争辩说,只有当数百万,十亿或更多的单个数据通过算法链接在一起时,“大数据”才作为商品出现。这样的决定并不是在真空中发生的,而是作为不对称权力关系的一部分,在这种关系中,人们将个人在日常生活中产生的数据分配给他们。我们认为,这种数据获取过程的不对称性是资本主义“通过剥夺积累”的一种手段,它以以前不可能的方式殖民和商品化了日常生活。将“大数据”的承诺置于数字边界主义的乌托邦想象中,我们认为数据殖民主义的过程实际上正在这些乌托邦式的承诺背后展开。在私营公司和学术界对新型数据分析和可视化形式感到兴奋之际,将大数据作为资本主义征用和剥夺的一种形式强调了对数据和社会的批判性,理论性理解的迫切需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号