首页> 外文期刊>Environment and History >'Pursued steadily, quietly, unfalteringly': The Work of Wild Bird Protectionists in Britain during World War One
【24h】

'Pursued steadily, quietly, unfalteringly': The Work of Wild Bird Protectionists in Britain during World War One

机译:“稳步地追求,悄悄地,不行,”:在第一次世界大战期间英国野鸟保护主义者的工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article assesses the conduct of bird conservationists, particularly Britain's premier wild bird conservation agency, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB), during World War One in Britain. Drawing on the journals and annual reports of the RSPB, newspaper articles and correspondence, the agricultural press and publications of the Board of Agriculture, this essay shows how the RSPB firstly used the war to its advantage as it campaigned against feathered millinery and then claimed to initiate a new branch of British manufacturing. However, as the article then shows, the pressures of war led to problems for wild birds, as an increasingly hungry populace targeted them; the public were discouraged from providing bird-food; and species regarded as vermin, especially sparrows, were targeted in the drive to maximise agricultural output. These issues led to parliamentary action, drew comment from newspapers and their readers and led to an increasingly fractious relationship between agricultural interests and conservationists. Significantly, as this essay demonstrates, the RSPB defied the Defence of the Realm Act and through its journal it denounced official government policy, a most unusual stance given that the Society's supporters were titled and influential persons. Environmental historians have recently taken a keen interest in the environmental consequences of warfare, with sharp focus upon the direct results of fighting and its aftermath. This article argues that the 'home front' and the impact of warfare on fauna should not be neglected.
机译:本文评估了鸟类保护主义者,特别是英国首屈一指的野生鸟类保护机构,皇家野生鸟类保护机构,在英国第一次世界大战期间保护鸟类(RSPB)。借鉴“农业委员会委员会的RSPB,报”文章和通信,农业发局和函率的期刊和年度报告,这篇论文显示了RSPB如何首先将战争与其竞选的优势,因为它宣传了羽毛米利,然后索赔发起英国制造业的新分支机构。然而,随着文章的表明,战争的压力导致野生鸟类的问题,因为越来越饥饿的人群瞄准它们;公众因提供鸟类食品而沮丧;和被视为害虫,特别是麻雀的物种都是针对的,以最大化农业产出。这些问题导致议会行动,从报纸及其读者汲取评论,并导致农业利益和保护主义者之间越来越大的关系。值得注意的是,正如本文演示的那样,RSPB藐视境界法案,并通过其展示官方政府政策,这是一个最不寻常的立场,因为社会的支持者是有影响力的人。环境历史学家最近对战争环境后果感兴趣,剧烈关注战斗的直接结果及其后果。本文认为,“家庭前沿”和战争对动物区的影响不容忽视。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号