首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >RULING CREATES NEW QUESTIONS FOR SUPERFUND COST RECOVERY SUITS
【24h】

RULING CREATES NEW QUESTIONS FOR SUPERFUND COST RECOVERY SUITS

机译:裁定提出了有关超级成本回收衣服的新问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A federal appellate court is leaving the door open for responsible parties at toxic waste sites to recover costs under the Superfund law's liability provision even if they have entered into a cleanup agreement with EPa— a ruling that raises new questions about how courts will interpret a landmark Supreme Court ruling earlier from this year. In an Oct. 18 ruling in the case ITT Industries, Inc. v. BorgWarner, Inc., et al., the 6th Circuit ruled plaintiffs may be able to recover cleanup costs under section 107 of the Superfund law, rather than under section 113, even though the plaintiff had entered into an administrative order on consent (AOC) with EPA. Relevant documents are available on InsideEPA.com. See page 2 for details.
机译:联邦上诉法院为有毒废物现场的责任方敞开大门,以根据《超级基金法》(Superfund Law)的赔偿责任条款追讨费用,即使他们已与EPa达成清理协议,该裁决也引发了新的问题,即法院将如何诠释地标性建筑最高法院于今年早些时候作出裁决。在10月18日ITT Industries,Inc.诉BorgWarner,Inc.等案的裁决中,第六巡回法院裁定原告可能能够根据《超级基金法》第107条而非第113条追讨清理费用。 ,即使原告已与EPA签订了行政许可命令(AOC)。有关文件可在InsideEPA.com上找到。有关详细信息,请参见第2页。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号