首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Judges Question EPA Authority For Ozone Fee Guide Seen As Final Action
【24h】

Judges Question EPA Authority For Ozone Fee Guide Seen As Final Action

机译:法官质疑美国环保署(EPA)臭氧费用指南是否被视为最终行动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Appellate court judges at oral arguments questioned EPA's authority for issuing a guidance allowing states to offer alternatives to a Clean Air Act fee program for sources of ozone pollution, while suggesting that the guidance can be seen as final agency action subject to review because it has changed the behavior of state and federal regulators. The three U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit judges hearing the May 12 oral arguments over the guidance appeared to generally back the Natural Resources Defense Council's (NRDC) claims and rebuff the agency's arguments that the document is a non-binding, non-final action because it creates no new requirements.
机译:上诉法院的法官在口头辩论中对EPA发布指导原则的权威提出质疑,该指导原则允许各州为臭氧污染源提供《清洁空气法》收费计划的替代方案,同时建议该指导原则可以视作最终机构行动,因为它已更改州和联邦监管机构的行为。美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院的三名法官在5月12日听取了有关该指导方针的口头辩论,似乎总体上支持了自然资源保护委员会(NRDC)的主张,并拒绝了该机构的论点,即该文件不具有约束力,不具有约束力。 -最后的动作,因为它不会产生新的要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号