...
首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Judges Question Whether EPA 'Once In' Air Toxics Memo Is 'Final Action'
【24h】

Judges Question Whether EPA 'Once In' Air Toxics Memo Is 'Final Action'

机译:法官质疑EPA“一旦进入”空气中毒备忘录是否是“最终行动”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Appellate judges, during April 1 oral arguments, questioned whether EPA's memo rescinding its longstanding "once in, always in" air toxics policy represents "final agency action" subject to judicial review, though they gave no clear indication of how they would rule. During argument in California Communities Against Toxics, et al. v. EPA, at al., a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit sharply questioned lawyers for EPA, environmentalists and California on why the January 2018 memo issued by agency air chief Bill Wehrum should be considered "final" action eligible for court review.
机译:上诉法官在4月1日的口头辩论中,质疑EPA废除其长期“一进一出”空气中有毒物质政策的备忘录是否代表“最终代理诉讼”,需要司法审查,尽管他们没有明确说明如何会统治。在加州抗毒药社区争论中,等。诉EPA案,美国哥伦比亚特区巡回上诉法院的三人陪审团对EPA,环保主义者和加利福尼亚州的律师提出了严峻的质疑,为何应考虑由代理航空局长比尔·韦赫鲁姆(Bill Wehrum)发布的2018年1月的备忘录可以接受法院审查的“最终”诉讼。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号