首页> 外文期刊>Inside EPA's environmental policy alert >Environmentalists Narrow 'Mega' Suit After Judge Threatens Dismissal
【24h】

Environmentalists Narrow 'Mega' Suit After Judge Threatens Dismissal

机译:法官威胁解雇后,环保主义者缩小了“超级”诉讼

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Environmentalists have narrowed their suit seeking to force EPA to retroactively review the effects of scores of pesticides on hundreds of endangered species, filing a new complaint that targets agency approval of more than 50 active ingredients, down from nearly 300 named in the original suit. In the June 5 amended complaint in Center For Biological Diversity (CBD), et al., v. EPA, environmentalists argue that the agency has failed to consult with federal wildlife agencies as required under section 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) when it granted Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) registration for 31 pesticides and to re-initiate consultations after making changes to the registration of 43 pesticides, though some chemicals fall into both categories.
机译:环保主义者已经缩小了他们的诉讼范围,试图迫使EPA追溯评估数十种农药对数十种濒危物种的影响,并提出了新的投诉,目标是机构批准50多种有效成分,而最初诉讼中的名称是近300种。在6月5日修订的《生物多样性中心(CBD)等人诉EPA》中的申诉中,环保主义者认为,环保署未能按照《濒危物种法案》(ESA)第7条的规定与联邦野生动植物机构进行磋商。它批准了31种农药的联邦杀虫,杀菌和灭鼠法(FIFRA)注册,并且在对43种农药进行注册变更后重新启动了磋商,尽管有些化学品属于这两种类别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号