首页> 外文期刊>Entsorga Magazin >In Novel Ruling, Court Rejects U.S. Stance On Superfund Settlement Credits
【24h】

In Novel Ruling, Court Rejects U.S. Stance On Superfund Settlement Credits

机译:在小说裁决中,法院拒绝美国对超级基金结算信用的立场

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In an unusual ruling, a federal district court in Wisconsin has rejected the United States' arguments about how a potentially responsible party's (PRP) liabilities for cleanup may be offset, finding the question of whether the federal government over-recovered for natural resources damages (NRD) at a Superfund site and the effect that may have on other liabilities must go to trial. The United States argued in United States of America, et al. v. NCR Corporation, et al. that Superfund law does not allow a non-settling PRP to attempt to offset its cleanup response liabilities by the amount of a settlement made by other PRPs and which the government steered to NRD recovery.
机译:在一项不寻常的裁决中,威斯康星州的联邦地方法院拒绝了美国关于如何抵消潜在责任方(PRP)的清理责任的论点,从而发现了联邦政府是否因自然资源损害而过度追回的问题( NRD)以及可能对其他负债产生的影响必须进行审判。美国在美国等人争论。 v。NCR Corporation等。超级基金法不允许不和解的PRP试图用其他PRP达成的和解金额抵消其清算响应债务,并且政府引导NRD恢复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号