首页> 外文期刊>Engineering Structures >Collapse risk of controlled rocking steel braced frames considering buckling and yielding of capacity-protected frame members
【24h】

Collapse risk of controlled rocking steel braced frames considering buckling and yielding of capacity-protected frame members

机译:考虑屈曲和产量保护框架构件的受控摇动钢支撑框架的崩溃风险

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The response in the higher modes of controlled rocking steel braced frames (CRSBFs) significantly increases the frame member forces during earthquakes relative to those from a first-mode pushover analysis. Previous research has generally assumed that these large demands must be addressed either by designing frame members for the full elastic force demands or by mitigating the higher mode response by providing multiple nonlinear mechanisms. However, the minimum required design forces for structural elements have not been assessed through collapse fragility analysis. To address this need, this paper investigates the influence of member buckling and yielding on the collapse capacity of 3-storey, 6-storey and 12-storey buildings. For each building height, five frames are designed based on multiplying the estimated higher-mode forces by a different amplification factor, defined as ?HM, and adding these to the forces expected from a first-mode pushover analysis, with ?HM = 0,1.0, 1.5, 2.25, and 3.0. The collapse performance for each design is evaluated using multiple stripe analysis for conditionally selected ground motions considering both the first-mode and second-mode periods independently and using a model in which frame member buckling and yielding are included. Neglecting the higher-mode forces (i.e. using ?HM = 0) for design is only acceptable for the 3-storey and 6-storey buildings when a response modification factor of R = 8 is used. Increasing ?HM reduces the collapse risk, and designing for ?HM = 3.0 yields similar collapse probabilities compared to when frame member buckling and yielding are not modelled. Based on the results of this study, using ?HM = 1.0 is recommended for reliable collapse prevention during a 2%-in-50-year event, which represents a reduction of up to 50% relative to the elastic design forces that have been recommended by a variety of authors in previous studies.
机译:受控摇动钢支撑框架(CRSBFS)的较高模式的响应在地震期间相对于来自第一模式推进分析的响应显着增加了框架构件力。以前的研究通常假设必须通过设计用于全弹力的框架成员或通过提供多个非线性机制来减轻更高模式响应来解决这些大的需求。然而,通过塌陷脆弱性分析尚未评估结构元件的最低所需设计力。为了解决这一需求,本文调查了成员屈曲和屈服对3层,6层高的建筑物的崩溃能力的影响。对于每个建筑高度,基于将估计的更高模式力量乘以不同的放大因子,定义为ΔHM的五个帧,并将其添加到从第一模式推送分析中预期的力,具有?HM = 0, 1.0,1.5,2.25和3.0。使用多条带分析来评估每个设计的崩溃性能,用于定义选择的接地运动,考虑到第一模式和第二模式周期并使用其中包括框架成员屈曲和屈服的模型。忽略较高模式力(即,使用?HM = 0)对于设计仅适用于r = 8的响应修改因子时的3层和6层的建筑物。随着帧成员屈曲和屈服而不是建模时,增加了崩溃风险,并为3.0表示,为3.0设计产生类似的崩溃概率。基于本研究的结果,建议使用ΔHM= 1.0进行2%-5-50岁的事件期间可靠的崩溃预防,这相对于推荐的弹性设计力表示高达50%的减少通过以前的研究中的各种作者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号