...
首页> 外文期刊>Energy Policy >What do local stakeholders think about the impacts of small hydroelectric plants? Using Q methodology to understand different perspectives
【24h】

What do local stakeholders think about the impacts of small hydroelectric plants? Using Q methodology to understand different perspectives

机译:当地利益相关者如何看待小型水力发电厂的影响?使用Q方法学来理解不同的观点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Researchers, politicians and investors are seeking to develop an agenda related to renewable energy technology and its greatest challenges and opportunities. The present study aims to analyze the perceptions of local stakeholders regarding the social, environmental and economic impacts of small hydroelectric plants. The use of Q Methodology revealed the existence of a range of perceptions among local stakeholders. Essentially, five groups with different perceptions were identified, namely: 'I'm critical', "I see regional benefits', 'I want more results', 'I want social well-being' and 'I weigh all sides'. The article recommends policy-makers should increase transparency and communication regarding the activities related to projects of this nature, in addition to emphasizing the need to review the policies that regulate the energy system.
机译:研究人员,政治人物和投资者正在寻求制定与可再生能源技术及其最大挑战和机遇有关的议程。本研究旨在分析当地利益相关者对小型水力发电厂的社会,环境和经济影响的看法。 Q方法论的使用揭示了当地利益相关者之间存在多种观念。从本质上讲,确定了五个具有不同看法的群体,即:“我很关键”,“我看到区域利益”,“我想要更多的结果”,“我想要社会福祉”和“我权衡各方”。文章建议决策者除强调需要审查规范能源系统的政策外,还应增加与此类项目相关活动的透明度和沟通。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号