首页> 外文期刊>The Energy Journal >Can China's Energy Intensity Constraint Policy Promote Total Factor Energy Efficiency? Evidence from the Industrial Sector
【24h】

Can China's Energy Intensity Constraint Policy Promote Total Factor Energy Efficiency? Evidence from the Industrial Sector

机译:中国的能源强度约束政策能否促进总因素能源效率?来自工业部门的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

As part of the country's efforts to achieve green development, China implemented a mandatory energy intensity reduction target in its 11th "Five-Year Plan (FYP)" in 2006, and then began to roll out a series of relevant measures. However, existing studies have paid little attention to the actual effects of China's energy intensity constraint policy (EICP). In this paper, using panel data from China's 36 industrial sub-sectors covering the years from 2001 to 2014, we adopt the difference-in-differences (DID) method to investigate for the first time the EICP's (marginal) effect on total factor energy efficiency growth (TFEEG). We also estimate the superposition effect caused by the introduction of a carbon intensity constraint policy (CICP) on TFEEG, through the difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) strategy. Finally, using counterfactual, re-grouping and quasi-DID analyses, we conduct a series of robustness tests of the empirical results. The results show that the TFEEG in China's industrial sector experienced an overall declining trend between 2001 and 2014. The implementation of the EICP has had a significantly negative effect on the improvement of the TFEEG of sub-sectors with higher levels of energy intensity. After the implementation of the EICP, the TFEEG rate of these sub-sectors declined by 4.31%, compared to the rate of the other sub-sectors. The results of a series of robustness tests indicate that such a negative effect is credible. The marginal effect in the first two years after the implementation of the EICP was significantly negative, while the superposition effect of the introduction of a CICP on industrial TFEEG remained negative. Thus, the Chinese government should reinforce the implementation of energy-saving policies by introducing additional market-oriented auxiliary policies to propel the green development transformation of China's industrial sector.
机译:作为该国实现绿色发展努力的一部分,2006年,中国实施了第11次“五年”(FYP)的强制性能源强度减少目标,然后开始推出一系列有关措施。然而,现有研究几乎没有关注中国能源强度约束政策(EICP)的实际影响。在本文中,使用来自中国36个工业子行业的面板数据从2001年到2014年涵盖的几年,我们采用差异差异(DID)方法来调查EICP(边缘)对总因素能源的影响效率生长(TFEEG)。我们还通过差异差异(DDD)策略引入TFEEG的碳强度约束政策(CICP)引入碳强制约束政策(CICP)引起的叠加效应。最后,使用反事实,重新分组和准确实分析,我们开展了一系列经验结果的鲁棒性测试。结果表明,中国工业部门的TFEEG经历了2001年至2014年之间的总体下降趋势。EICP的实施对改善具有更高水平的能源强度的子部门的改善具有显着负面影响。在实施EICP之后,与其他子部门的速率相比,这些子部门的TFEEG率下降了4.31%。一系列稳健性测试的结果表明这种负面影响是可信的。 EICP实施后的前两年的边际效应显着消极,而引入工业TFEEG的CICP的叠加效果仍为阴性。因此,中国政府应通过引入额外的市场辅助政策来加强能源政策的实施,以推动中国工业部门的绿色发展转型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号