首页> 外文期刊>Energy and Buildings >Thermo-economic comparison of coal-fired boiler-based and groundwater-heat-pump based heating and cooling solution - A case study on a greenhouse in Hubei, China
【24h】

Thermo-economic comparison of coal-fired boiler-based and groundwater-heat-pump based heating and cooling solution - A case study on a greenhouse in Hubei, China

机译:基于燃煤锅炉和地下水 - 热泵加热和冷却液的热经济比较 - 以湖北省温室为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Currently in China, the replacement of coal-fired boilers by clean and renewable energy sources is considered as an essential measure to alleviate air pollution. This paper investigates the thermo-economic performance of replacing a coal-fired boiler by a Ground water Heat Pump (GWHP) system for a greenhouse, where the GWHP system was constructed to reduce emission and also to provide cooling. The operation of this system has been monitored over a one-year period. The results show that the thermal efficiency factor of the boiler varies in the range of 0.53-0.68 and the Coefficient of Performance (COP) of the GWHP system averages at 4.1 for cooling and at 3.3 for heating. Although the boiler has both lower capital costs and lower operating costs, the analysis of Average Energy Price (AEP) shows that the GWHP system has a higher economic performance, since it has a lower AEP of 0.040 USD /kWh in heating and 0.023 USD/kWh in cooling over an expecting lifetime of 20 years, in comparison to the boiler at 0.052 USD/kWh over a lifetime of 10 years. This indicates that GWHP system may be considered as an alternative over traditional boilers in terms of thermo-economic performance for applications in other places of the world with similar climate condition. (c) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:目前在中国,通过清洁和可再生能源更换燃煤锅炉被认为是缓解空气污染的重要措施。本文调查了通过用于温室的地下水热泵(GWHP)系统代替燃煤锅炉的热经济性能,其中构建了GWHP系统以减少排放,并提供冷却。在一年内监测了该系统的操作。结果表明,锅炉的热效率因子在0.53-0.68的范围内变化,GWHP系统的性能系数(COP)在4.1时为4.1进行冷却,以3.3加热。虽然锅炉具有较低的资金成本和较低的运营成本,但平均能源价格(AEP)的分析表明,GWHP系统具有更高的经济性能,因为它在加热中的曝光率为0.040美元/千瓦时,0.023 USD / KWH在预期寿命为20年的寿命,与锅炉在0.052美元/千瓦时的寿命超过10年。这表明,在具有类似气候条件的世界其他地方的应用中,GWHP系统可以被认为是传统锅炉的替代方案。 (c)2020 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号