首页> 外文期刊>Emerging Topics in Computing, IEEE Transactions on >Little Knowledge Isn’t Always Dangerous—Understanding Water Distribution Networks Using Centrality Metrics
【24h】

Little Knowledge Isn’t Always Dangerous—Understanding Water Distribution Networks Using Centrality Metrics

机译:小知识并不总是危险的—使用集中度指标了解配水网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Addressing nonrevenue water, a major issue for water utilities, requires identification of strategic metering locations using calibrated hydraulic models of the water network. However, calibrated hydraulic models use both static and dynamic network data and are often prohibitively expensive. We present an approach to understand water network operations that uses only the static information of the network. Specifically, we analyze water networks using augmented centrality measures. We use readily available static information about network elements (e.g., diameters of pipes) rather than calibrated dynamic information (e.g., roughness coefficients of pipes, demands at nodes), and model each network element appropriately for analysis using customized centrality measures. Our approach identifies: 1) pipes carrying higher flows; 2) nodes with higher delivery heads; and 3) pipes with higher failure impact. Each of the above helps in determining strategic instrumentation locations. We validate our analysis by comparison with fully calibrated hydraulic models for three benchmark topologies. Our experimental evaluation shows that centrality analysis yields results which have a match of more than 85% with those obtained using calibrated hydraulic models on benchmark networks without significant over-provisioning. We also present results from a real-life case study where our approach matched 78% with locations picked by experts.
机译:解决非收入水是自来水公司的一个主要问题,需要使用经过校准的水网水力模型来确定战略计量位置。但是,校准后的水力模型会同时使用静态和动态网络数据,而且价格往往过高。我们提出一种仅使用网络的静态信息来理解水网络运行的方法。具体来说,我们使用增强的集中度度量分析水网络。我们使用有关网络元素的容易获得的静态信息(例如,管道直径),而不是经过校准的动态信息(例如,管道的粗糙度系数,节点需求),并使用自定义的中心度度量对每个网络元素进行适当建模以进行分析。我们的方法确定:1)输送更高流量的管道; 2)具有更高交付头的节点; 3)故障影响较大的管道​​。以上每一项都有助于确定战略工具的位置。通过与针对三种基准拓扑的完全校准的液压模型进行比较,我们验证了我们的分析。我们的实验评估表明,中心度分析得出的结果与在基准网络上使用校准的水力模型获得的结果相比,匹配率超过了85%,而没有明显的超额配置。我们还提供了真实案例研究的结果,其中,我们的方法与专家选择的位置相匹配了78%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号