...
首页> 外文期刊>Emerging Topics in Computing, IEEE Transactions on >Can Algorithm Diversity in Stream Cipher Implementation Thwart (Natural and) Malicious Faults?
【24h】

Can Algorithm Diversity in Stream Cipher Implementation Thwart (Natural and) Malicious Faults?

机译:流密码实施中的算法多样性能否阻止(自然和)恶意故障?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Hardware implementations of stream and other ciphers are vulnerable to natural faults. Moreover, attackers can launch fault attacks on these implementations. Concurrent error detection is used as a countermeasure against natural and malicious faults. We propose an algorithm diversity (AD) to detect natural and malicious faults in stream ciphers. We compare AD with hardware, time, and information redundancies. Hardware redundancy has 100% hardware overhead, but is not secure against fault attacks. Time redundancy has lower hardware overhead, but is vulnerable to faults that are injected in both the computation and recomputation. Information redundancy techniques, such as parity, cannot detect an even number of faulty bits. Information redundancy techniques, such as robust code, have higher fault miss rate (FMR) with higher hardware overhead. If robust code is configured to have lower FMR than AD in certain attacker model, the hardware overhead is excessively high. AD provides higher security compared to existing techniques. It enables a cost-effective tradeoff between security, performance overhead, and hardware overhead.
机译:流和其他密码的硬件实现易受自然故障的影响。此外,攻击者可以对这些实施方式发起故障攻击。并发错误检测被用作针对自然和恶意故障的对策。我们提出一种算法多样性(AD),以检测流密码中的自然和恶意故障。我们将AD与硬件,时间和信息冗余进行比较。硬件冗余具有100%的硬件开销,但是对于故障攻击而言并不安全。时间冗余具有较低的硬件开销,但易受计算和重新计算中注入的故障的影响。信息冗余技术(例如奇偶校验)不能检测偶数个故障位。诸如鲁棒代码之类的信息冗余技术具有较高的故障丢失率(FMR)和较高的硬件开销。如果在某些攻击者模型中将健壮代码配置为具有比AD低的FMR,则硬件开销过高。与现有技术相比,AD提供更高的安全性。它可以在安全性,性能开销和硬件开销之间进行经济高效的折衷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号