...
首页> 外文期刊>Emergency Radiology >Aortic rupture: comparison of three imaging modalities
【24h】

Aortic rupture: comparison of three imaging modalities

机译:主动脉破裂:三种成像方式的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We report a case of a 56-year-old man with traumatic aortic rupture (TAR) sustained in a motor vehicle accident diagnosed by helical computed tomography, aortography, and transesophageal echocardiography. A large majority of patients with TAR never make it to the hospital, and for those who do, a timely diagnosis is critical for survival. We discuss the merits and pitfalls of the three imaging modalities.
机译:我们报告了一例56岁男子在螺旋形计算机断层扫描,主动脉造影和经食道超声心动图诊断为机动车事故中持续遭受创伤性主动脉破裂(TAR)。绝大多数TAR患者从未去过医院,对于那些TAR患者,及时诊断对于生存至关重要。我们讨论了三种成像方式的优缺点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号