【24h】

Bare Necessities

机译:生活必需品

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A FRIEND WHO HAD JUST PURCHASED A 10-YEAR-OLD HOUSE ASKED ME whether he and his wife should spend money to have his electrical contractor install all the newest safety devices. We reviewed the existing equipment so I could help him determine what different safety devices he might need and their approximate cost. I told him to ask his EC's recommendation as well. The EC would better answer the cost questions. Two opinions are better than one, after all. I determined by the approximate age of the home that none of the overcurrent devices nor the electrical circuits in his service panelboard were arc-fault circuit-interrupter-protected circuits. Based on the newest edition of the National Electrical Code (NEC), I also determined many of the circuits that should have been ground-fault circuit-interrupter (GFCI) protected were not.
机译:一位刚购买了10年历史的老房子的朋友问我,他和他的妻子是否应该花钱让他的电气承包商安装所有最新的安全设备。我们审查了现有设备,以便我帮助他确定他可能需要哪些不同的安全设备以及它们的近似成本。我告诉他也要问问欧盟委员会的建议。欧共体最好回答成本问题。毕竟,有两种观点胜过一种观点。我根据房屋的大致年龄确定,过电流设备或服务面板中的电路均不是电弧故障电路断路器保护的电路。根据最新版的《美国国家电气法规》(NEC),我还确定了许多本应受到接地故障断路器(GFCI)保护的电路。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Electrical contractor》 |2019年第6期|58-58|共1页
  • 作者

    Mark C. Ode;

  • 作者单位

    Underwriters Laboratories Inc;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号