首页> 外文期刊>Electric light & power >Project portfolios generate value, controversy
【24h】

Project portfolios generate value, controversy

机译:项目组合产生价值,引起争议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Since divestiture of utility-owned generation began in the mid-90s nearly 400 generating facilities have been sold in more than 75 transactions. While many sales involve individual power projects, most involve portfolios of projects. Controversy surrounds several aspects of the portfolio sales. Is a portfolio worth more than the sum of its stand-alone project values? If so, why and how much? Is a portfolio a device for creating and exercising market power? Of 396 projects sold through year-end 2000, 365 were sold as part of a transaction involving at least one other project. During 2001 there were only a few divestitures and the patterns are similar. While these data show that portfolio transactions are common, they may also paint a misleading picture of value. The 31 single-project sales include some large and high-value facilities such as Homer City. More important, many of the portfolios sold actually have little synergy and thus they yield little extra value to a new owner. Sellers, buyers, regulators, and tax and judicial parties need to recognize this fact. A detailed evaluation of the sales shows why.
机译:自从90年代中期开始剥离公用事业发电以来,已售出超过400笔发电设施,交易超过75笔。尽管许多销售涉及单个电力项目,但大多数涉及项目组合。争议涉及投资组合销售的几个方面。投资组合的价值是否超过其独立项目价值的总和?如果是这样,为什么又要多少?投资组合是建立和行使市场力量的工具吗?到2000年底,已售出396个项目,其中365个是作为至少涉及另一个项目的交易的一部分出售的。在2001年期间,仅进行了几次资产剥离,而且剥离的方式相似。尽管这些数据表明投资组合交易很普遍,但它们也可能描绘出误导性的价值图景。 31个单项目销售包括一些大型和高价值的设施,例如荷马城。更重要的是,许多出售的投资组合实际上没有什么协同作用,因此,它们对新所有者而言几乎没有额外的价值。卖方,买方,监管机构以及税务和司法部门都需要认识到这一事实。详细的销售评估说明了原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号