首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >MORALIZED PSYCHOLOGY OR PSYCHOLOGIZED MORALITY? ETHICS AND PSYCHOLOGY IN RECENT THEORIZING ABOUT MORAL AND CHARACTER EDUCATION
【24h】

MORALIZED PSYCHOLOGY OR PSYCHOLOGIZED MORALITY? ETHICS AND PSYCHOLOGY IN RECENT THEORIZING ABOUT MORAL AND CHARACTER EDUCATION

机译:道德心理学或心理学道德?道德与品格教育的近期理论中的伦理与心理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Moral philosophy seems well placed to claim the key role in theorizing about moral education. Indeed, moral philosophers have from antiquity had much to say about psychological and other processes of moral formation. Given this history, it may seem ironic that much systematic latter-day theorizing about moral education has been social scientific, and that some of the major trends in the field have been led by empirical or other psychologists. Moreover, while acknowledging the influence of such major past philosophers as Plato, Aristotle, and Kant on the primary modern movements of cognitive developmen-talism, care ethics, and character education, some recent social scientists have called for the development of a "psychologized morality" in the interests of an even more leading role for psychological research in the theory of moral formation. In this essay, David Carr surveys and critically evaluates these trends in theorizing moral education.
机译:道德哲学似乎可以很好地主张在道德教育理论化中的关键作用。确实,道德哲学家从古代开始就关于道德形成的心理过程和其他过程有很多话要说。在这段历史的背景下,具有讽刺意味的是,后来关于道德教育的系统化理论已经成为社会科学,并且该领域的一些主要趋势已由经验或其他心理学家主导。此外,在承认过去的主要哲学家如柏拉图,亚里斯多德和康德对认知发展论,护理伦理学和品格教育的主要现代运动的影响时,一些最近的社会科学家呼吁发展“心理道德”。 ”,以期在道德形成理论中对心理学研究发挥更大的领导作用。在本文中,戴维·卡尔(David Carr)对道德教育理论化的趋势进行了调查和批判性评估。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Theory》 |2007年第4期|p.389-402|共14页
  • 作者

    David Carr;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:20:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号