首页> 外文期刊>Educational Theory >DISCOURSE, JUSTIFICATION, AND EDUCATION: JUERGEN HABERMAS ON MORAL EPISTEMOLOGY AND DIALOGICAL CONDITIONS OF MORAL JUSTIFICATION AND RIGHTNESS
【24h】

DISCOURSE, JUSTIFICATION, AND EDUCATION: JUERGEN HABERMAS ON MORAL EPISTEMOLOGY AND DIALOGICAL CONDITIONS OF MORAL JUSTIFICATION AND RIGHTNESS

机译:讨论,辩护和教育:儒尔·哈贝马斯论道德辩证法和道德辩护与权利的对话条件

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In this essay Walter Okshevsky addresses the question of whether a certain form of dialogically derived agreement can function as an epistemic (universal and necessary) criterion of moral judgment and ground of moral authority. Okshevsky examines arguments for and against in the literature of educational philosophy and develops Juergen Habermas's affirmative answer as presented in his discourse theory of morality. Habermas's position is articulated as a moral epistemology ("strong dialogicality") and is developed through his critique of the "monologism" of certain aspects of Immanuel Kant's moral theory. Okshevsky concludes with a consideration of some educational implications of Habermas's position.
机译:在本文中,沃尔特·奥克谢夫斯基(Walter Okshevsky)解决了以下问题:某种形式的对话衍生协议是否可以充当道德判断的道德(普遍的和必要的)准则和道德权威的基础。霍克谢夫斯基审视了教育哲学文献中赞成和反对的论点,并提出了哈尔马斯(Juergen Habermas)的道德话语理论所提出的肯定回答。哈贝马斯的立场是作为一种道德认识论(“强对话性”)表达出来的,并且通过他对伊曼纽尔·康德道德理论某些方面的“独白主义”的批判而得到发展。霍克谢夫斯基最后总结了哈贝马斯这一职位的一些教育意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Theory》 |2016年第6期|691-718|共28页
  • 作者

    Walter C. Okshevsky;

  • 作者单位

    Faculty of Education Memorial University of Newfoundland;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:18:32

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号