...
首页> 外文期刊>Educational Studies: A Journal of the American Educational Studies Association >Hermeneutic Haunting: E. D. Hirsch, Jr. and the Ghost of Interpretive Validity
【24h】

Hermeneutic Haunting: E. D. Hirsch, Jr. and the Ghost of Interpretive Validity

机译:诠释学的困扰:E。D. Hirsch,Jr.和解释有效性的鬼魂

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This article applies criteria for validity in interpretation to Eric Donald Hirsch, Jr.'s interpretations of John Dewey. Specifically, three criteria that Hirsch, himself, established in his earlier work are used to evaluate Hirsch's interpretation of John Dewey as a member of a class (romantics) who embraced a naive naturalism (trait) more often than not (instances within a class) to the great detriment of other salient aspects of education. Hirsch calls his K-8 Core Knowledge sequence revolutionary. His revolution's justification rests, in part, on his rejection of an educational tradition that he attributes to John Dewey and his disciples. Hirsch uses his interpretation of Dewey to portray those who continue to take Dewey's ideas seriously as naive, dogmatic obstructionists who are blocking positive educational reform. Because Hirsch falls short of his own standards for validity in his interpretation of John Dewey, this article suggests that professors of education who continue to rework Dewey's ideas may be sources of potential insight in addressing educational challenges rather than intransigent obstructionists.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2011.602271
机译:本文将解释的有效性标准应用于小Eric Donald Hirsch对John Dewey的解释。具体来说,赫希本人在早期工作中建立的三个标准用于评估赫希对约翰·杜威作为一个班级成员(浪漫主义者)的解释,而约翰杜威是一个经常接受天真自然主义(特质)的人(一个班级中的例子)严重损害了教育的其他重要方面。赫希称他的K-8核心知识序列具有革命性。他革命的理由部分在于他拒绝接受他归因于杜威和他的门徒的教育传统。赫希用他对杜威的解释来描绘那些继续认真对待杜威思想的人,因为他们是天真的,教条主义的阻挠主义者,阻碍了积极的教育改革。由于赫希(Hirsch)在解释杜威(John Dewey)时没有达到自己的效用标准,因此本文建议那些继续重塑杜威(Dewey)思想的教育教授可能是解决教育挑战的潜在见解的来源,而不是顽强的阻挠主义者。 var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2011.602271

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号