首页> 外文期刊>Educational Psychologist >Bridging Cognition and Socioculturalism Within Conceptual Change Research: Unnecessary Foray or Unachievable Feat?
【24h】

Bridging Cognition and Socioculturalism Within Conceptual Change Research: Unnecessary Foray or Unachievable Feat?

机译:在概念变更研究中架起认知与社会文化主义的桥梁:不必要的进取或无法实现的壮举?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The articles in this special issue were analyzed in terms of their stance on the nature of knowledge (i.e., its source and location) and the perspective on conceptual change addressed. The analysis supported the argument that efforts to bridge the cognitive and sociocultural orientations toward conceptual change are either unnecessary or unachievable. Specifically, there are those theorists and researchers who do not give credence to the existence of concepts for the one or the collective, and those who do not see sociocultural influences as needed for concept formation or reformation. Attempts to bridge these two positions seem doomed to failure. Conversely, it is argued that the frameworks and models espoused by many researchers, including those contributing to this issue, cannot exist without recognition of the thoughts and reflection of the mind or without consideration of the sociocultural influences that exist in the world outside the mind.
机译:分析了本期特刊中有关知识性质(即知识的来源和位置)的立场以及对概念变化的看法。该分析支持这样一种论点,即将认知和社会文化取向与概念变化联系起来的努力是不必要的或无法实现的。具体来说,有些理论家和研究人员不相信一个人或集体的概念的存在,而有些人则不认为概念形成或改革需要社会文化的影响。试图弥合这两个立场似乎注定要失败。相反,有人认为,许多研究者所拥护的框架和模型,包括促成这一问题的框架和模型,如果不认识到思想和思想的反思,或者不考虑存在于思想之外的世界的社会文化影响,就不可能存在。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Educational Psychologist》 |2007年第1期|67-73|共7页
  • 作者

    Patricia A. Alexander;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Human Development, University of Maryland,;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 00:55:37

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号