首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Economics focus
【24h】

Economics focus

机译:经济学重点

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Once, a beautiful turn of phrase would take you a long way in economics. From Adam Smith to John Maynard Keynes, economists were content to put their theories and ideas into (mostly) English prose, and leave it at that. Their big, breezy thoughts made great, but imprecise reading. Contradictions were glossed over. So prolix was Keynes, for example, that he is thought to have said everything at least once. This will no longer do. Since 1945 or so, practitioners of what was once called "political economy" have become more demanding. They sought to test their grand thoughts against the hard facts of the real world. Incomes, interest rates, and prices of all sorts could be measured. Did they behave as theory supposed? National accounts, the detailed measures of GDP, were just being created, at Keynes's behest. But economic data were, and still are, messy; analysing them even more so. It took decades to develop the tools to detect and measure economic relationships with much certainty.
机译:曾经,一次美丽的措辞将带您走很长一段经济学的道路。从亚当·斯密(Adam Smith)到约翰·梅纳德·凯恩斯(John Maynard Keynes),经济学家都满意地将他们的理论和思想付诸于(主要是)英语散文中,而不必理会。他们大而轻柔的想法使人赞叹不已,但阅读不准确。矛盾被掩盖了。例如,凯恩斯就是这样的混蛋,以至于他至少说了一切。这将不再起作用。自1945年左右以来,曾经被称为“政治经济”的实践者的要求越来越高。他们试图将自己的宏伟思想与现实世界的艰难事实进行对比。可以测量各种收入,利率和价格。他们的行为符合理论假设吗?应凯恩斯的要求,刚刚建立了国民生产总值,即国内生产总值的详细指标。但是经济数据过去是,现在仍然是混乱的。对其进行分析。花了数十年的时间来开发用于确定和测量经济关系的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号