首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Charlemagne: Constitutional conundrums
【24h】

Charlemagne: Constitutional conundrums

机译:查理曼大帝:宪法难题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The unconvincing versus the self-serving. That pretty much describes the two sides limbering up for a political scrap over the European Union's constitutional treaty, two years after it was thrown out in French and Dutch referendums. As Europe's leaders prepare for their June summit discussion on salvaging bits of the treaty, two camps are forming, pitting the worthy countries that have accepted the old text (the ratifiers) against the troublesome ones which insist it must be less ambitious in both appearance and content (the minimalists). Do not expect high-minded debate between the two. The ratifiers' arguments are lofty-sounding but unconvincing. The minimalists' ones amount to naked self-interest. Which side triumphs will tell you much about how the EU ticks.
机译:不令人信服与自我服务。这几乎可以说明双方在欧盟和欧盟宪法条约被抛弃两年后,他们都为欧盟的宪法条约屈服于政治废话。欧洲领导人准备在6月的峰会上讨论如何挽救该条约的一部分时,正在形成两个阵营,使那些接受旧文本的有价值的国家(批准国)与那些麻烦的国家(坚持认为该条约的外观和野心都必须较小)相提并论。内容(极简主义者)。不要期望两者之间有高尚的辩论。批准者的论点听上去很高但是令人信服。极简主义者的利益等于赤裸裸的自我利益。哪一方的胜利会告诉您有关欧盟如何变化的更多信息。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2007年第8530期|p.40|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济;各科经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:31:50

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号