首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Decisions, Decisions
【24h】

Decisions, Decisions

机译:决定,决定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Dictators and authoritarians will disagree, but democracies work better. It has long been held that decisions made collectively by large groups of people are more likely to turn out to be accurate than decisions made by individuals. The idea goes back to the "jury theorem" of Nicolas de Condorcet, an 18th-century French philosopher who was one of the first to apply mathematics to the social sciences. Now it is becoming clear that group decisions are also extremely valuable for the success of social animals, such as ants, bees, birds and dolphins. And those animals may have a thing or two to teach people about collective decision-making.rnAnimals that live in groups make two sorts of choices: consensus decisions in which the group makes a single collective choice, as when house-hunting rock ants decide where to settle; and combined decisions, such as the allocation of jobs among worker bees.
机译:独裁者和独裁者会不同意,但民主制运作得更好。长期以来一直认为,由大批人集体做出的决定比由个人做出的决定更有可能是准确的。这个想法可以追溯到18世纪法国哲学家尼古拉斯·德·康多塞(Nicolas de Condorcet)的“陪审定理”,他是最早将数学应用于社会科学的人之一。现在变得很清楚,群体决策对于成功的社会动物(例如蚂蚁,蜜蜂,鸟类和海豚)也非常有价值。那些动物可能只有一两件事可以教给人们有关集体决策的知识。集体生活的动物有两种选择:共识决策,即集体做出单一的集体选择,就像找房子的岩蚁在哪里决定。定居;以及综合决策,例如工蜂之间的工作分配。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2009年第8618期|91-92|共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:30:51

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号