首页> 外文期刊>The economist >Pros and cons of the protests
【24h】

Pros and cons of the protests

机译:抗议的利弊

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

sir - Lexington was right to point out that the Occupy Wall Street protests are not America's Tahrir Square (October 8th). Where he was wrong was thinking that American democracy, with its permanent campaigns, is "exquisitely sensitive" to voters' wants. The opposite is true: protesters have taken to the street out of frustration with both sides of our bitterly divided government. We perceive a downward trajectory for our lives, which is likely to become even steeper for our children. Face it, American workers were far better off before our economy became globalised and dominated by the financial-services industry. Since these two trends are unlikely to be reversed, the wealth that is generated must mitigate the effect on workers.
机译:先生-列克星敦正确地指出,占领华尔街的抗议活动不是美国的解放广场(10月8日)。他错在哪里,以为美国的民主运动及其永久性的竞选活动对选民的需求“极为敏感”。事实恰恰相反:示威者出于对我们两极分化的政府双方的沮丧而走上街头。我们认为我们的生活呈下降趋势,这对于我们的孩子而言可能会变得更加陡峭。面对现实,在我们的经济全球化和由金融服务业主导之前,美国工人的状况要好得多。由于这两种趋势不可能逆转,因此产生的财富必须减轻对工人的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《The economist》 |2011年第8757期|p.19|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 23:30:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号