首页> 外文期刊>Economics & philosophy >The normative gap: mechanism design and ideal theories of justice
【24h】

The normative gap: mechanism design and ideal theories of justice

机译:规范性差距:机制设计和司法理想理论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates the relationship between economic theory and theories of justice in the design of public policy. In particular, it focuses on the role of mechanism design in policy contexts beset with issues of social, racial and distributive justice. Economists' involvement in redesigning Boston's algorithm for allocating K-12 students to public schools serves as an instructive case study. The paper draws on the distinction betweenideal theoryandnon-ideal theoryin political philosophy and the concept ofperformativityin economic sociology to argue that mechanism design can enact elaborate ideal theories of justice. Anormative gapthus emerges between the goals of the policymakers and the objectives of economic designs. As a result, mechanism design may obstruct stakeholders' avenues for normative criticism of public policies, and serve as a technology of depoliticization.
机译:本文调查了公共政策设计中经济理论与司法理论的关系。特别是,它侧重于机制设计在政策背景下的作用,具有社会,种族和分配正义问题。经济学家参与重新设计波士顿将K-12学生分配给公立学校的算法是一个有助性的案例研究。本文借鉴了不同的实质和非理论政治哲学与实验性经济社会学的概念,争论机制设计可以制定司法的理想理论。政策制定者的目标与经济设计的目标之间存在敏感性息头。因此,机制设计可能会阻碍利益相关者的途径,以促进对公共政策的规范性批评,并作为代olitic化的技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号