...
首页> 外文期刊>Economic modelling >Bivariate income distributions for assessing inequality and poverty under dependent samples
【24h】

Bivariate income distributions for assessing inequality and poverty under dependent samples

机译:二元收入分布,用于评估依赖样本下的不平等和贫困

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

As indicators of social welfare, the incidence of inequality and poverty is of ongoing concern to policy makers and researchers alike. Of particular interest are the changes in inequality and poverty over time, which are typically assessed through the estimation of income distributions. From this, income inequality and poverty measures, along with their differences and standard errors, can be derived and compared. With panel data becoming more frequently used to make such comparisons, traditional methods which treat income distributions from different years independently and estimate them on a univariate basis, fail to capture the dependence inherent in a sample taken from a panel study. Consequently, parameter estimates are likely to be less efficient, and the standard errors for between-year differences in various inequality and poverty measures will be incorrect This paper addresses the issue of sample dependence by suggesting a number of bivariate distributions, with Singh-Maddala or Dagum marginals, for a partially dependent sample of household income for two years. Specifically, the distributions considered are the bivariate Singh-Maddala distribution, proposed by Takahasi (1965), and bivariate distributions belonging to the copula class of multivariate distributions, which are an increasingly popular approach to modelling joint distributions. Each bivariate income distribution is estimated via full information maximum likelihood using data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey for 2001 and 2005. Parameter estimates for each bivariate income distribution are used to obtain values for mean income and modal income, the Gini inequality coefficient and the headcount ratio poverty measure, along with their differences, enabling the assessment of changes in such measures over time. In addition, the standard errors of each summary measure and their differences, which are of particular interest in this analysis, are calculated using the delta method.
机译:作为社会福利的指标,不平等和贫困的发生率一直受到决策者和研究人员的关注。特别令人关注的是不平等和贫困随时间的变化,通常通过估计收入分配来评估。由此,可以得出和比较收入不平等和贫困衡量标准,以及它们之间的差异和标准误差。随着面板数据越来越多地用于进行这样的比较,传统方法独立地处理不同年份的收入分配并在单变量基础上对其进行估计,因此无法捕获面板研究样本中固有的依赖性。因此,参数估计的效率可能较低,并且各种不平等和贫困测度的年际差异的标准误差将是不正确的。本文通过建议使用Singh-Maddala或Singh-Maddala提出一些双变量分布来解决样本依赖问题。 Dagum边际,对于家庭收入的部分依赖样本,为期两年。具体来说,考虑的分布是Takahasi(1965)提出的双变量Singh-Maddala分布,以及属于copula类的多变量分布的双变量分布,这是对联合分布建模的一种越来越流行的方法。使用来自2001年和2005年澳大利亚家庭,收入和劳动动态(HILDA)调查的数据,通过最大信息最大似然估计每个双变量收入分布。每个双变量收入分布的参数估计值用于获取平均收入和模态收入的值,基尼不平等系数和人员比率贫困程度度量标准以及它们之间的差异,可以评估这些度量标准随时间的变化。此外,使用增量方法计算每个汇总度量的标准误差及其差异,这在此分析中特别重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号