首页> 外文期刊>Economic Development Quarterly: The Journal of American Economic Revitalization >Did the Community Renewal Tax Incentives Pirate Businesses From Other Places?
【24h】

Did the Community Renewal Tax Incentives Pirate Businesses From Other Places?

机译:社区续签税收激励措施是否会盗版其他地方的企业?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An early concern regarding place-based economic developments was that they might encourage business relocation into target neighborhoods at the expense of other places. To address this concern, when the U.S. Congress passed the Empowerment Zone/Enterprise Community (EZ/EC) program, it included an "antipirating" provision prohibiting use of grants for business relocation. Later iterations of the EZs and Renewal Communities (RCs) received tax incentives only. The RC program did not include an antipirating provision. Did businesses relocate? This study compares business moves within 1,000 feet inside a given RC/EZ with moves within 1,000 feet outside the RC/EZ before and after the intervention. Data are from the National Establishment Time Series (NETS) Database for California and Tennessee. Moves into some RC/EZs increased but so did moves out, leading to no statistically significant net change in numbers of firms. There were no obvious differences between RCs and EZs. The article concludes with policy recommendations.
机译:关于基于位置的经济发展的早期关注是,它们可能会鼓励以其他地方为代价,将企业迁移到目标社区。为了解决此问题,美国国会通过了赋权区/企业社区(EZ / EC)计划时,其中包括一项“反盗版”规定,禁止将赠款用于企业搬迁。 EZ和更新社区(RC)的后续迭代仅获得税收优惠。 RC程序未包含反盗版条款。企业搬迁了吗?这项研究比较了干预前后给定RC / EZ内1,000英尺以内的业务移动与RC / EZ外1,000英尺以内的业务移动。数据来自加利福尼亚和田纳西州的国家建立时间序列(NETS)数据库。迁入某些RC / EZ的人数增加了,但迁出的人数也增加了,导致公司数量没有统计上的显着净变化。 RC和EZ之间没有明显差异。本文以政策建议作为结尾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号