首页> 外文期刊>Econometric Reviews >What are the Differences in Trend Cycle Decompositions by Beveridge and Nelson and by Unobserved Component Models?
【24h】

What are the Differences in Trend Cycle Decompositions by Beveridge and Nelson and by Unobserved Component Models?

机译:Beveridge和Nelson以及未观察到的组件模型在趋势周期分解中有什么区别?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When a certain procedure is applied to extract two component processes from a single observed process, it is necessary to impose a set of restrictions that defines two components. One popular restriction is the assumption that the shocks to the trend and cycle are orthogonal. Another is the assumption that the trend is a pure random walk process. The unobserved components (UC) model (Harvey, 1985) assumes both of the above, whereas the BN decomposition (Beveridge and Nelson, 1981) assumes only the latter. Quah (1992) investigates a broad class of decompositions by making the former assumption only.
机译:当应用某个过程从单个观察过程中提取两个组件过程时,有必要施加一组限制来定义两个组件。一个普遍的限制是假设趋势和周期的冲击是正交的。另一个假设是趋势是纯随机游走过程。未观察到的分量(UC)模型(Harvey,1985)假定了以上两种情况,而BN分解(Beveridge和Nelson,1981)仅假定了后者。 Quah(1992)仅通过做出前一个假设来研究广泛的分解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号